Talk:Project Veritas#rfc B32EAD0
{{talk header}}
{{FAQ|collapsed=no|quickedit=no}}
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|ap|ab}}
{{Round in circles|search=no}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|1=
{{WikiProject United States |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Organizations |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Conservatism|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Low|American=yes|American-importance=low}}
{{WikiProject New York (state)|importance=Low|Hudson=yes|Hudson-importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Journalism |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Media |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Skepticism |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Alternative Views |importance=Low}}
}}
{{annual readership |expanded=|scale=log}}
{{connected contributor (paid)|User1=Sal at PV|U1-client=Project Veritas|U1-employer=Project Veritas}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 8
|minthreadsleft = 1
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(21d)
|archive = Talk:Project Veritas/Archive %(counter)d
}}
__TOC__
Project Vertias referenced for helping the EPA to discover $20B in "wasted funds"
Should a summary of this story be listed in the Notable Incidents section?
:no: WP:FOXNEWSPOLITICS soibangla (talk) 22:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
::Washington Post has since reported on it as well
::
:::It's common knowledge that the new administration thinks any funds related to climate change are "wasted". But I don't see a good reason to include this here. O3000, Ret. (talk) 19:09, 11 May 2025 (UTC)