Talk:Red Army#Polish Revisionism
{{Talk header|search=no|noarchives=yes}}
{{controversial}}
{{calm}}
{{Article history
|action1=WPR
|action1date=18:01, 13 December 2006
|action1link=Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/Red Army
|action1result=reviewed
|action1oldid=93795275
|action2=GAN
|action2date=19:46, 22 May 2007
|action2result=listed
|action2oldid=132755462
|action3=GAR
|action3date=15:28, 03 april 2008
|action3link=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Red_Army/1
|action3result=Delisted
|action3oldid=202694864
|currentstatus=DGA
|topic=History
|otd1date=2005-02-23|otd1oldid=11117637
|otd2date=2006-02-23|otd2oldid=40830430
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Military history|class=C|B-Class-1=no|B-Class-2=yes|B-Class-3=yes|B-Class-4=yes|B-Class-5=yes|National=yes|Russian=yes|Asian=yes|European=yes|WWII=yes}}
{{WikiProject Soviet Union|importance=Top|mil=yes|hist=yes|rus=yes|rus-importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Socialism|importance=mid}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 95K
|counter = 3
|minthreadsleft = 3
|algo = old(90d)
|archive = Talk:Red Army/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{archivebox|auto=yes|bot=MiszaBot|age=90|search=yes}}
Unofficial Red Army Flag
The article states that a flag with a yellow star on a red background was the unofficial flag, but when checking the source its actually stating that it was a myth with no basis. This implies that it never was an unofficial flag in any sense, and it makes me feel like the article should not include it since it has no historical usage according to the source. 75.235.201.216 (talk) 04:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
:Correct. Removed everywhere. - Altenmann >talk 00:37, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Banner
conflict in losses
Two sentences side by side give seriously differing "official" numbers:
- " Officially, the Red Army lost 6,329,600 killed in action (KIA), 555,400 deaths by disease"
- "The official grand total of losses amounted to 8,668,400.[3][4] This is the official total dead"
Come, mister tallyman, tally me banana. An clarification is due. --Altenmann >talk 02:43, 28 February 2025 (UTC)