Login
Login

Talk:Reigomys/GA1

GA Review

{{al|{{#titleparts:Holochilus primigenus/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Holochilus primigenus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Airplaneman ✈ 18:41, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

:GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
  2. :a (prose): {{GAList/check|y}} b (MoS): {{GAList/check|y}}
  3. :: Prose flows quite well, terms linked/described adequately (thanks, WP:POPUPS). Airplaneman ✈ 18:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
  4. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  5. :a (references): {{GAList/check|y}} b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|y}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|y}}
  6. :: Good here. Airplaneman ✈ 18:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
  7. It is broad in its coverage.
  8. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|y}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|y}}
  9. :: Yes. Airplaneman ✈ 18:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
  10. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
  11. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
  12. ::
  13. It is stable.
  14. :No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|y}}
  15. ::
  16. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
  17. :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|y}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|y}}
  18. :: Well, no images are used, but I understand they are either nonexistent, copyrighted or extremely hard to find. Airplaneman ✈ 18:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
  19. Overall:
  20. :Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
  21. :: Yes, definitely GA status. For FA, I would recommend getting hold of some pictures (if possible). Airplaneman ✈ 18:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)