Talk:Robert Peter Gale#rfc 43EA64E

Dr. Gale has contributed greatly to basic science and clinical research in bone marrow transplantation where he made central contributions to understanding the immune-mediated anti-leukemia effects of transplants (graft-versus-leukemia [GvL].

{{Archive top|result= Consensus is to maintain "Robert Peter Gale". Also, I note the {{tl|Authority control}} links (at bottom of article) all use Robert Peter Gale. – S. Rich (talk) 03:55, 16 December 2014 (UTC)}}

Is this person known as "Robert Peter Gale", especially per WP:NCP and WP:COMMONNAME? If not, what name by parenthetical disambiguation do you propose? --George Ho (talk) 09:53, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

:Sources refer to him as "Robert Gale". I suggest the article should be titled "Robert Gale (physician)". Maproom (talk) 08:07, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

• Comment Summoned here by bot. Since this article is inadequately sourced, it is difficult to ascertain from the footnotes. Google seems to give the edge to the current article title. Coretheapple (talk) 16:27, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
• Use what the sources use NYT [http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch/#/%22robert+peter+gale%22/] uses "Robert Peter Gale" consistently. [http://www.nytimes.com/1987/08/16/nyregion/medical-use-of-fetal-tissues-spurs-new-abortion-debate.html] "Robert Gale" only once per the NYT search. I consider the NYT to be an admirable source on such major issues. Google News finds 36 recent articles with "Robert Peter Gale." "Robert Gale" has 288 results total - but amazingly enough - they ain't him. "Robert Gale" and radiation" gets 16 hits there. So I rather think the full name is what ought be used on Wikipedia. Collect (talk) 00:13, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
• Comment His most recent book styles his name as Robert Peter Gale, as do his other books and his journal articles. His website styles his name in the same way. If the name of this article is to be changed to Robert Gale, so should the article on John Philip Sousa be renamed as John Sousa. Lou Sander (talk) 02:37, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
• Comment We should continue to use the full name as most of the sources appear to lean towards it. Fraulein451 (talk) 18:56, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
• Comment Agree with the foregoing. Use the full name. He already appears in the disambiguation page for Robert Gale, so persons looking for him shouldn't have a hard time finding him. (Robert and Gale both are common names, so we can't really avoid disambiguation). "Robert Gale (physician)" is a bit of a pain, because no one is likely to enter that as a search term. JonRichfield (talk) 08:55, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
• Robert Peter Summoned by bot. His notability is as a scientist, so how he is named on his papers should be leading. Randomly clicking on some pubmed hits (please don't start about Google in this context) always gave Robert Peter for journals that use first names rather than initials. I also checked the most cited and most recent paper on which he co-authored (on web of knowledge, no really please stop about Google) and both said Robert Peter. Note that middle names of other authors were reduced to initials. For example his most cited article is : "By Mary M. Horowitz, Robert Peter Gale, Paul M. Sondel," etc. So while i congratulate anyone who is on a first name basis with him, science (and the public) is on a first plus second name basis ;-) PizzaMan (♨♨) 00:48, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
• Keep as it is - Most of the sources in the article say "Robert Peter Gale", Even his own website refers to him as such, Even on Google Books he's known as Robert Peter Gales [https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Robert+Peter+Gale&oq=Robert+Peter+Gale]] –Davey2010 • (talk) 03:49, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

{{Archive bottom}}

There appears be to quite a few blog posts saying that ARS patients treated in Kiev by Leonid Kindzelsky had much better outcomes than patients treated in Moscow by Gale. Alliumnsk (talk) 13:11, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

{{coi|date=January 2020}}

It would appear that User:Robertpetergale is also the subject of this article. He added some info in the career section back in 2011; nothing problematic, IMO. Anomalous+0 (talk) 20:09, 12 January 2020 (UTC)