Talk:Roe v. Wade#Context for poll results

{{Talk header}}

{{American English}}

{{Article history

|action1=FAC

|action1date=2005-01-26, 05:11:45

|action1link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Roe v. Wade

|action1result=promoted

|action1oldid=9665099

|action2=FAR

|action2date=12:15, 5 February 2007

|action2link=Wikipedia:Featured article review/Roe v. Wade/archive1

|action2result=kept

|action2oldid=105759523

|action3=FAR

|action3date=23:48, 21 April 2012

|action3link=Wikipedia:Featured article review/Roe v. Wade/archive2

|action3result=removed

|action3oldid=488356303

|maindate=February 22, 2005

|currentstatus=FFA

|otd1date=2005-01-22|otd1oldid=16335116

|otd2date=2006-01-22|otd2oldid=36086581

|otd3date=2007-01-22|otd3oldid=102228689

|otd4date=2008-01-22|otd4oldid=186119351

|otd5date=2009-01-22|otd5oldid=265659386

|otd6date=2010-01-22|otd6oldid=339350413

|otd7date=2011-01-22|otd7oldid=409189609

|otd8date=2015-01-22|otd8oldid=643604513

|otd9date=2023-01-22|otd9oldid=1135041042

|otd10date=2025-01-22|otd10oldid=1270725847

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=

{{WikiProject Women's Health|importance=High}}

{{WikiProject Abortion|importance=high}}

{{WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases|importance=top}}

{{WikiProject Law|importance=Mid}}

{{WikiProject Politics|importance=mid|American=yes|American-importance=high}}

{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=high}}

{{WikiProject Feminism|importance=High}}

{{WikiProject United States|importance=mid|USGov=Yes|USGov-importance=high}}

{{WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia}}

}}

{{Press

| author=Lawrence Solomon

| date=2008-07-08

| url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/08/opinion/main4241293.shtml

| title=Wikipropaganda On Global Warming

| org=CBS News

}}

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Talk:Roe v. Wade}}

{{ArbCom sanctions - abortion}}

{{banner holder|collapsed=yes|

{{annual readership|days=500|scale=log|width=570}}

{{Backwards copy|authorlist=Simon, Rita J.; Abdel-Moneim, Mohamed Alaa|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GK00DwAAQBAJ&pg=PP64|title=Public Opinion in the United States: Studies of Race, Religion, Gender, and Issues That Matter|year=2009|org=Routledge|id=127885807|comments=This book first published in 2009 copies portions of this article that appear in revisions as early as 2007.}}

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|maxarchivesize = 150K

|counter = 4

|minthreadsleft = 4

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}

|algo = old(30d)

|archive = Talk:Roe v. Wade/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{Top 25 report|May 1 2022|May 8 2022|Jun 19 2022|Jun 26 2022}}

{{Annual readership}}

Blackmun's "Chronological" Entry

The only reason I've been mentioning about Harry Blackmun's "chronological" entry in the Supreme Court decision is to sum up the day. He wrote "Abortion decisions down. LBJ dies." I only note this to mention the role that the Supreme Court also played in paying tribute to LBJ. It is relevant, not trivia, because of who led the SCOTUS tributes. -- SnoopyAndCharlieBrown202070 (talk)

Justices in the Majority

For the justices in the majority, should we keep the picture of just Harry Blackmun, as he wrote the majority opinion, or can we also add those of Chief Justice of Warren Burger and Thurgood Marshall? The only reason I'm asking this is because the big news the day of Roe v. Wade was the passing of LBJ and although both Burger and Marshall were in the majority, they also led the SCOTUS tributes on the passing. SnoopyAndCharlieBrown202070 (talk) 01:33, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Death of LBJ

One thing that I mentioned here that was removed, but I feel that it needs to be mentioned is that the news of Roe v. Wade was overshadowed by that of the passing of LBJ and that both happened on the same day. The passing of LBJ overshadowed Roe v. Wade and was the banner headlines on newspapers the day after. I used Golden Age Nursing Home fire article as the guide, as that happened the day after the assassination of JFK, but the news of it was overshadowed by the assassination. SnoopyAndCharlieBrown202070 (talk) 23:39, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Discrepancy in dates

Under History of the case, there is an apparent discrepancy between the second paragraph, which states that McCorvey discovered her pregnancy in June 1969, and the third, which states that she gave birth on June 2, 1970. Both cite apparently reliable sources, which do support the respective claims: the first date is given by Arlidge in [https://books.google.com/books?id=1Uw0DgAAQBAJ&pg=PA176 The Lawyers Who Made America], while the second is given by Prager in [https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2021/09/jane-roe-v-wade-baby-norma-mccorvey/620009/ Jane Roe's Baby Tells Her Story]. How should this be resolved?

Personally, looking at both sources, I'm inclined to attribute this to a mistake of fact on Arlidge's part, even if his book is generally reliable. The claim for the date of birth is more specific and more recent, and the article indicates it's based on the author's access to primary sources. Arlidge does not indicate where he got the date for his claim. Agreeable-absurdist (talk) 16:03, 29 October 2024 (UTC)