Talk:SCP: Secret Laboratory

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --Aevann (talk) 14:59, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

I removed copyrighted text.

I AM NOT A EMPLOYEE OF NORTHWOOD STUDIOS!!!! Guys i am not I just like the game and like editing wikipedia!

--AndrewMidkiff (talk) 19:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

I've rewritten much of the article to better comply with various sourcing and manual of style requirements. The content is honestly pretty sparse, but with the available sourcing this is about as good as we are going to get. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

It should have their titles and details about how they work in-game.169.244.116.71 (talk) 13:35, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

I can't remember what the specific term is, but this article has a lot of information that I'm pretty sure is too specific and listy to be anywhere but a Fandom wiki. casualdejekyll (talk) 15:11, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

• To be more specific, something that immediately jumps out is that the list of SCP's here is longer then the list of SCP's on the SCP Foundation article, which is just not all that necessary casualdejekyll (talk) 15:18, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
• I just went ahead and deleted the SCPs section. WP:BOLD I guess. Feel free to revert or check the history for any salvageable information casualdejekyll (talk) 15:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

The recent edit describing 173 is wrong. I will change this soon. Please do not change it back. Porinc (talk) 20:40, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Soooo I'm new, I like this game, but after reading Wikipedia for a long time I want to say that this article is a bit of a mess and I'm not sure whether or not it even qualifies as relevant enough. I'm thinking of rewriting a few sections, can anybody check in when I'm done? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheKidWhoEdits (talk • contribs) 14:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

1. The Description is like 90% of the article. I think it should be shortened.

2. The other sections need more info in them.

Some sources:

• https://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/scp-secret-laboratory
• https://whatoplay.com/pc/scp-secret-laboratory

-- MrRhino683 (Talk) 14:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Roles section needs a lot of work, if it's even necessary at all. But there's basically no form of reliable source on it; best I could find is [https://www.yekbot.com/scp-secret-laboratory-all-classes-guide/ this article] but I'm not going to try and interpret it.

TheKidWhoEdits (talk) 15:34, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Hey,

I'm going over the 2020 discussion for AfD, and it looks like there was no consensus achieved.

This begs the question - why was this article removed 2 years later in 2022 by @ElijahPepe ? ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SCP:_Secret_Laboratory&oldid=1101433622 change 1], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SCP:_Secret_Laboratory&oldid=1101438422 change 2])

Eljah later added a redirect from this game, to a completely different, although related game.

I found no further discussions that'd prompt this deletion, or that'd be relevant to this discussion.

Best regards - LatekVon (talk) 23:45, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

:After further reading, I see the first change was a mass deletion of unsourced material, the edit summary also mentions "irrelevance" of the removed sections. The "irrelevance" argument would have to be verified by someone more familiar with Wikipedia's articles about video games; I'm personally not sure about their invalidity. The "unsourced" argument could be considered valid, if it wasn't already discussed in the AfD debate, where lack of sources was considered "fixable" by some.

:Regarding the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SCP:_Secret_Laboratory&oldid=1101438422 second change], removing the rest of the entire article, in the summary, Elijah wrote that the removal was done as per the last AfD. The last AfD did not conclude that the article should be removed, and thus this change is invalid.

:Due to the present data, I'm reverting the second change, as I'm certain of it's invalidity, and I will withhold on the first change, as I'm not certain about it's validity. LatekVon (talk) 23:56, 23 March 2025 (UTC)