Talk:STS-121#Timeline merge proposal

I'm thinking if we could move the timeline to a separate page so we can have the article as short as possible. Could any administrators do it? Thanks. Bigtop 06:24, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

:There's now a separate page STS-121 Timeline, so the ==Timeline== section needs to be cut down in this article to just a summary, to avoid duplicating all that information. 131.111.8.98 17:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to {{plural:2|one external link|2 external links}} on STS-121. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=698789267 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060723042544/http://mynasa.nasa.gov/pdf/149873main_sts121_press_kit.pdf to http://mynasa.nasa.gov/pdf/149873main_sts121_press_kit.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060619035520/http://www.damec.dk:80/vis.asp?id=41 to http://www.damec.dk/vis.asp?id=41

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:06, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on STS-121. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=704221872 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101231062751/http://www.space.com:80/missionlaunches/sts121_rtf_story_archive.html to http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/sts121_rtf_story_archive.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

It seems that this is the only space shuttle mission for which there's a separate timeline page. I understand that the split was proposed for purpose of main article brevity, but is this necessary here? The timeline section on this page is still quite long already. Slovborg (talk) 19:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

:Personally, I think that seems logical. If there's not any other kind of precedent for a split like that, I agree in that it doesn't really feel necessary, even if the main page is getting a little long. It makes more sense for the one page to be a little bit longer rather than have two pages that kind of regurgitate the same information (bad comparison, but descriptive, I think.) XFalcon2004x (talk) 22:36, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

:Yeh, I think it's a reasonable idea. Dexcube (talk) 11:27, 8 February 2025 (UTC)