Talk:Sam Fuld

{{talk header}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{aan}}

|maxarchivesize = 200K

|counter = 1

|minthreadsleft = 4

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|algo = old(21d)

|archive = Talk:Sam Fuld/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{ArticleHistory

|action1=GAN

|action1date=15:41, 10 March 2011

|action1link=Talk:Sam Fuld/GA1

|action1result=listed

|action1oldid=417994713

|action2=GAR

|action2date=4 November 2016 (UTC)

|action2link=Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Sam Fuld/1

|action2result=delisted

|action2oldid=776872762

|currentstatus=DGA

|topic=sports

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=B|listas=Fuld, Sam|1=

{{WikiProject Biography |sports-priority=low |sports-work-group=yes }}

{{WikiProject Baseball |college=yes |importance=low |cubs=yes |cubs-importance=low|phillies=yes|phillies-importance=}}

{{WikiProject United States |importance=low |NH=yes |NH-importance=low }}

{{WikiProject Illinois |importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Chicago |importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Tampa Bay |importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Philadelphia|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Florida |importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Stanford University |importance=Low}}

}}

{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn

|target=/Archive index

|mask=/Archive <#>

|leading_zeros=0

|indexhere=yes}}

{{Daily pageviews}}

Tags removed as not supported by the actual article state

I reviewed it, see no evidence of bias whatsoever (all dryly supported by RSs), and the quotation use is within proper bounds, as reflected by GA approval and my review. 2604:2000:E016:A700:5560:828A:F503:4AD8 (talk) 18:12, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

:I will not revert your edit again. While I disagree about the neutrality of this article, it did pass a GA review as you stated. The article is on presently being re-assessed for its GA-status, I will leave it the other reviewers to determine where there are too many quotes or if this article is too biased for a GA article. There are other articles in need of more work. --  StarScream1007  ►Talk  18:41, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

why

The way this article is written, you’d think this is a Hall of Fame player. There was a lot of unnecessary information I removed. It seems more or less fine now, but there was definitely some information within this article I found tedious and completely redundant. Leggomygreggo8 (talk) 06:54, 2 October 2019 (UTC)