Talk:Sarah Palin#Take two
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header}}
{{Controversial}}
{{Round in circles|search=no}}
{{FAQ}}
{{Article history
|action1=GAN
|action1date=15:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
|action1link=Talk:Sarah Palin/GA1
|action1result=failed
|action1oldid=240908335
|action2=GAN
|action2date=04:01, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
|action2link=Talk:Sarah Palin/GA2
|action2result=failed
|action2oldid=667327384
|currentstatus=FGAN
|topic=Politics and government
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|blp=yes|class=C|listas=Palin, Sarah|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=high}}
{{WikiProject Alaska|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Beauty Pageants|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Conservatism|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=mid|American=yes|American-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|AZ=yes|AZ-importance=low|USgovernors=yes|USgovernors-importance=low|USPE=Yes|USPE-importance=high|ID=Yes|ID-importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Women writers|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Women}}
}}
{{Press
| title= Wikipedia Edits Forecast Vice Presidential Picks
| author= Brian Krebs
| date= August 29, 2008
| url= http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/29/AR2008082902691.html
| org= The Washington Post
| title2= Palin's Wikipedia Entry Gets Overhaul
| author2= Yuki Noguchi
| date2= August 29, 2008
| url2= http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyid=94118849
| org2= NPR
| title3= Tug of war over Wiki entry on Palin
| author3= Chris O'Brien
| date3= August 29, 2008
| url3= http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_10338833
| org3= San Jose Mercury News
| title4= Sarah Palin Wikipedia edits--fast and furious
| author4= Natalie Weinstein
| date4= August 30, 2008
| url4= http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10029598-38.html
| org4= CNET News
| title5= Don’t Like Palin’s Wikipedia Story? Change It
| author5= Noam Cohen
| date5= September 1, 2008
| url5= http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/01/technology/01link.html
| org5= The New York Times
| url6= http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10029598-38.html
| org6= CNET News
| title7= Sarah Palin's immensely flattering Wikipedia entry
| author7= Jemima Kiss
| date7= September 1, 2008
| url7= http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/digitalcontent/2008/09/sarah_palins_immensely_flatter.html
| org7= The Guardian
| title8= Sarah Palin Wikipedia entry gets glowing make-over from mysterious user Young Trigg
| author8= Mike Harvey
| date8= September 1, 2008
| url8= http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article4653971.ece
| org8= The Times
| title9= Wikipedia e la biografia “ripulita” di Sarah Palin
| author9= Roberto Reale
| date9= September 2, 2008
| url9= http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/rainews24_2007/magazine/scenari/scenari_estate_09.asp
| org9= RAI
| title10= Wikipedia war emerges over details about Palin
| author10= Mark Sabbatini
| date10= September 2, 2008
| url10= http://www.juneauempire.com/stories/090208/sta_326628504.shtml
| org10= Juneau Empire
| title11= Who scrubbed Palin clean?
| author11= Iain Simons
| date11= September 2, 2008
| url11= http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/culture-tech/2008/09/usa-vote-palin-wikipedia
| org11=New Statesman
| title12= The Odd Lies Of Sarah Palin II: The Bridge To Nowhere
| author12= Andrew Sullivan
| date12= September 15, 2008
| url12=http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/09/the-lies-of-s-2.html
| org12=The Daily Dish
| title13= Sarah Palin winning the Wikipedia popularity contest
| author13= Stephanie Condon
| date13= September 17, 2008
| url13=http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10044085-38.html
| org13=CNET News
| title14=Why Google's online encyclopedia will never be as good as Wikipedia
| date14=September 22, 2008
| url14=http://www.slate.com/id/2200401/
| org14=Slate
| author14=Farhad Manjool
| title15=Updating a Reference Site on the Fly
| author15=Noam Cohen
| date15=November 9, 2008
| url15=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/technology/internet/10link.html
| org15=The New York Times
| author16=(none)
| date16=August 17, 2009
| url16=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/6043534/The-50-most-viewed-Wikipedia-articles-in-2009-and-2008.html
| title16=The 50 most-viewed Wikipedia articles in 2009 and 2008
| org16=The Daily Telegraph
| author17=Andy Miller
| title17=Welcome to Anchorpedia
| org17=Anchorage Press
| url17=https://www.anchoragepress.com/news/welcome-to-anchorpedia/article_ccfec22c-935e-55b7-b655-22d66ffdca3a.html
| date17=October 10, 2013
|author18 = Rhiannon Ruff
|title18 = Why Wikipedia can be a PR problem for political campaigns
|date18 = March 6, 2024
|org18 = PR Daily
|url18 = https://www.prdaily.com/why-wikipedia-can-be-a-pr-problem-for-political-campaigns/
|lang18 =
|quote18 =
|archiveurl18 =
|archivedate18 =
|accessdate18 = March 6, 2024
}}
{{Annual report|2008}}
{{pp-move-indef}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 66
|minthreadsleft = 4
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Sarah Palin/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=Talk:Sarah Palin/Archive index
|mask=Talk:Sarah Palin/Archive <#>
|leading_zeros=0
|indexhere=yes}}
Business insider is a Pulitzer Prize winning website. It says that Sarah Palin Probably Staged A Gigantic Hoax About Being Trig's Mother.
Why the wiki page on Sarah Palin wouldn't say a single word about this ?
https://www.businessinsider.com/sarah-palin-baby-hoax-2011-4 192.121.102.220 (talk) 07:48, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 22 April 2025
{{edit semi-protected|Sarah Palin|answered=y}}
Current language:
She also opposes abortion, including in cases of rape, incest, and embryonic stem cell research, but supports it if the mother's life is in jeopardy. She supports parental consent as a requirement for female minors seeking an abortion.
Proposed language:
She opposes abortion, unless the mother's life is in jeopardy, and also opposes embryonic stem cell research. She supports parental consent as a requirement for minors seeking an abortion.
Reason for proposed change: current wording is confusing, implying that embryonic stem cell research is a reason to seek an abortion. 2601:6C1:102:D9E0:77E9:DC9F:907A:4361 (talk) 22:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
:{{done}} Agreed that the previous wording was confusing. I didn't adopt your exact suggestion, but I think I cleared up the ambiguity. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 18:11, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Seems to have been some sort of error
Can someone fix the page? 2804:18:150:3B07:F4F8:EA2:8507:D375 (talk) 19:37, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 29 June 2025
{{SPER|ans=yes}}
Current language:Ryan Rudominer, a spokesman for the House Democratic campaign operation, called her involvement in various U.S. House campaigns a "great thing across the board".{{cite news|last=Davis|first=Susan|url=https://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PUB:SB10001424052748704575304575296822527981224.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100731044945/http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PUB%3ASB10001424052748704575304575296822527981224.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=July 31, 2010|title=Measuring the Impact of a Nod From Palin|work=The Wall Street Journal|date=June 10, 2010|access-date=August 15, 2010}}
Proposed language: After multiple Palin-endorsed candidates lost in house races, a spokesman for the House Democratic campaign operation, Ryan Rudominer, called her involvement a "great thing across the board".{{cite news|last=Davis|first=Susan|url=https://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PUB:SB10001424052748704575304575296822527981224.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100731044945/http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PUB%3ASB10001424052748704575304575296822527981224.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=July 31, 2010|title=Measuring the Impact of a Nod From Palin|work=The Wall Street Journal|date=June 10, 2010|access-date=August 15, 2010}}
Reason: Without context the statement could be interpreted as endorsement of Palin which it isn't (before checking the source I thought that he might be referring to her trying to get more women elected). Therefore the edit is needed for accuracy and NPOV.
Source: The context is drawn from the same source as the original sentence. 94.31.113.186 (talk) 09:49, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
:{{done}} Day Creature (talk) 22:47, 29 June 2025 (UTC)