Talk:School of thought#rfc 0AA4117

{{Talk header}}

{{Old AfD multi|date=3 October 2021 |result=keep |page=School of thought}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=

{{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject English Language|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Linguistics|importance=Low}}

}}

Rename to school of thought?

Seems like a better title. Thoughts? II | (t - c) 08:24, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Re Wikipedia:Notability tag

This is a useful and needed article, even though presently it may lack some required criteria. There is much room for expansion: suggest treat it at present as a stub article, until "the right contributor comes along". (Lobsterthermidor (talk) 14:11, 6 May 2012 (UTC))

''School of Thought'' album

{{closed rfc top

| status =

| result = Procedural close There is already a discussion on my talk page about this exact issue. Relitigating this here without mentioning it, and with a statement in breach of WP:RFCNEUTRAL, is poor form whether it is WP:FORUMSHOP or not... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 20:52, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

}}

Support hat note - On October 15, 2021, American rock band Ded will release a new music album entitled School of Thought. I have twice tried to create a hat note for this at the top of this page, and have twice been reverted. I believe that such hat note is helpful to people who are seeking the album, and is not harmful at all. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

:{{replyto|Jax 0677}} Why have you gone straight to WP:RFC without (so far as I can tell) observing WP:RFCBEFORE? Even if an RfC is justified, your statement is not neutral. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:35, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

  • Reply - Extensive discussion on the talk page is the first step for DR or 3O. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

{{closed rfc bottom}}