Talk:Seifert surface

This page could really do with some pictures. I thought about adding

:150px

(which, incidentally, someone incorrectly misnamed a Mobius band), but I don't know if we really need a Wikipedia logo on our Seifert surfaces. -- Fropuff 06:43, 2005 Feb 10 (UTC)

I think this is a bad candidate: This surface is not orientable (am I right?), and hence not a Seifert surface. Hermel (talk) 15:44, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

:It's orientable. --C S (talk) 21:53, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

To make some nice pictures, check out [http://www.win.tue.nl/~vanwijk/seifertview/ SeifertView]. It's a Windows program, but it also runs on Linux with WINE: "wine seifertview.exe". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.139.102.15 (talk) 13:41, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Since there seem to have been no valid objections from the 6 years of discussion on adding the image, I decided to be bold and add it myself. Revert if desired. --MarkGyver (talk) 07:19, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

[https://www.quantamagazine.org/special-surfaces-remain-distinct-in-four-dimensions-20220616/ ] could perhaps be mentioned. - Rod57 (talk) 19:44, 18 June 2022 (UTC)