Talk:Sejong the Great-class destroyer

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|

{{WikiProject Military history|class=Start

|B-Class-1=no

|B-Class-2=no

|B-Class-3=yes

|B-Class-4=yes

|B-Class-5=yes

|Korean=yes

|Maritime= yes}}

{{WikiProject Ships}}

{{WikiProject Korea|importance=Low|milhist=yes}}

}}

{{Archives}}

"Super Burke"

The words of "Super Burke" is not a generalized word. For example, when we search this word at Google and Yahoo, we can not find it. And Korean major newspapers don't use this word, too.

They said "the King Sejong-class destroyers are reportedly the second most powerful after the American version. [http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200705/200705150011.html Digital Chosun] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.217.70.191 (talkcontribs) 04:41, January 2, 2008

:They are, however, clearly an enlarged version of the Arleigh Burke Flight IIA design. 71.203.209.0 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 06:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

::Try searching for KDX "Super Burke" in Google. Anyway, the term "Super Burke" is not an official name or designation, but something that's been used by some USN personnel to describe the KDX-III's scale compared to the Arleigh Burke. enomosiki (talk) 02:07, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Changed the title

Sejong the Great itself includes the word 'king'. Writing as King Sejong the Great contains two word of king. Kadrun (talk) 22:56, 28 January 2012 (UTC)