Talk:Shakespeare authorship question#Safa Khulusi and the Arab Shakespeare/Shaykh Zubayr
{{Talk header|search=no}}
{{Round in circles}}
{{Article history|action1=PR
|action1date=02:08, 19 February 2010
|action1link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Shakespeare authorship question/archive1
|action1result=reviewed
|action1oldid=344933400
|action2=PR
|action2date=14:07, 5 January 2011
|action2link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Shakespeare authorship question/archive2
|action2result=reviewed
|action2oldid=406052516
|action3=FAC
|action3date=23:54, 3 April 2011
|action3link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Shakespeare authorship question/archive1
|action3result=promoted
|action3oldid=422220858
|currentstatus=FA
|maindate=April 23, 2011
|maindate2=April 23, 2017
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA|1=
{{WikiProject Shakespeare|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Alternative Views|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Skepticism|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Literature|importance=top}}
}}
{{Online source|year=2011
|section=August 2011
|title=Wikipedia's Shakespeare 'Problem'
|org=IEEE Spectrum
|date=August 2011
|url=http://spectrum.ieee.org/at-work/education/wikipedias-shakespeare-problem
|year2=2011
|section2=October 2011
|title2='Anonymous': New Hollywood Film Shows William Shakespeare as Someone Else
|org2=ABC News
|date2=October 2011
|url2=http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/anonymous-hollywood-film-shows-william-shakespeare/story?id=14725443
|year3=2010
|title3=Contested Will: Who Wrote Shakespeare? by James Shapiro
|org3=Simon & Schuster
|date3=2010
|url3=http://books.google.com/books?id=W8KtHtT3jNYC&pg=PA216&dq=wikipedia+shakespeare+authorship+question&hl=en&sa=X&ei=f5BcUdPdGLS6yAHayYHoCg&ved=0CEsQ6wEwAw#v=onepage&q=wikipedia%20shakespeare%20authorship%20question&f=false
|wikilink3=details
|year4=2013
|title4=Shakespeare Beyond Doubt: Evidence, Argument, Controversy Paul Edmundson, Stanley Wells, eds.
|org4=Cambridge University Press
|date4=2013
|url4=https://books.google.com/books?id=DdjhN1wO6tYC
|wikilink4=details
|year5=2019
|title5=Shakespeare Wrote Insightfully About Women. That Doesn’t Mean He Was One. by James Shapiro
|org5=The Atlantic
|date5=2019
|url5=https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2019/06/shakespeare-was-not-woman/590794/
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 200K
|counter = 32
|minthreadsleft = 4
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Shakespeare authorship question/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes |template=
}}
{{Graph:PageViews}}
''Upstart Crow'' as an "example"
That seems a little misleading to me, as what UC does is to satirise Mark Rylance as a 'just asking questions' Shaks-spar skeptic. But our text isn't entirely clear what it's being cited as an example of. Nor have I seen the original source. 109.255.211.6 (talk) 16:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
:Late answer, but it was a recurring plot-point, see for example [https://adoseofdavidmitchell.wordpress.com/2022/06/27/upstart-crow-the-facts-wild-laughter-in-the-throat-of-death/]. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 23:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Redirection?
Should Anti-Stratfordians redirect here? It doesn’t say that it does. Queermedea (talk) 18:06, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
:It looks like it currently does redirect here. Simonm223 (talk) 20:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Should our text mention that a syndicate was behind the alleged authorship of the Nancy Drew stories by Carolyn Deane?
Raising a question from a person banned from editing Wikipedia text. 2600:1700:BB10:EDE0:DCA0:F8C6:8A56:7D5A (talk) 22:15, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
:Not the text in this article. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 23:00, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
For the interested
[https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2024-10-15&end=2025-01-07&pages=Emilia_Lanier_theory_of_Shakespeare_authorship|Baconian_theory_of_Shakespeare_authorship|Crollalanza_theory_of_Shakespeare_authorship|Derbyite_theory_of_Shakespeare_authorship|Florian_theory_of_Shakespeare_authorship|Marlovian_theory_of_Shakespeare_authorship|Nevillean_theory_of_Shakespeare_authorship|Oxfordian_theory_of_Shakespeare_authorship|Prince_Tudor_theory Pageviews] on the WP-saq articles. At least on WP, Oxford still rules. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:52, 8 January 2025 (UTC)