Talk:Sierra Hull#rfc 90F6987

{{closed rfc top |result=Restore Consensus was to Add/Restore singer-songwriter categorisation. Aeonx (talk) 02:48, 20 July 2018 (UTC) }}

[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sierra_Hull&oldid=846953683 This version] of the article identified Hull as "singer-songwriter" rather than simply singer. It is verified by six reliable sources, including The Chicago Tribune. Hull has written most of the music she has recorded. One editor has reverted "singer-songwriter" twice, with the only argument being that it requires consensus. Should "singer-songwriter" be restored, with sources? 173.209.178.244 (talk) 19:23, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

• Restore singer-songwriter because it is reliably sourced and more accurate than "singer". 173.209.178.244 (talk) 19:24, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
• Restore singer-songwriter, as per reliable sources, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 11:02, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
• Restore {{sbb}} ^Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 17:00, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
• Add, not restore. Technically it is an add/change as the RFC requester added these comments then got reverted. Add the singer–songwriter occupation and follow the MOS by placing the references in the correct locations.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:32, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
• Include songwriter Invited by the bot. Well sourced, useful information. Also it's in the body of the article, and the lead is supposed to summarize the body of the article. North8000 (talk) 12:57, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
• Include (Invited by bot). It is well sourced and should be mentioned in the lead with correct references. Nauriya, Let's talk, 14:39, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
• Restore Person meets criteria under WP:COMPOSER, singer-songwriter is more correct. Aeonx (talk) 02:48, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

{{closed rfc bottom}}