Talk:Sini Shetty

I think it's in the rules that an article can be improved with unsourced content that seems noncontentious to the article's editors. 50.107.186.102 (talk) 18:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

:I'm not going to make that latest edit contentious but I don't think I'm allowed to edit the article anyway. Like good faith found in the rules, that editor seems to be having fun within some flow of facts that I'm aware of also, but without a source it will be an example of the editors' perception of the overall situation with some just not on it yet maybe, also? Either way, I'll enjoy seeing how this edit progresses as to me again, that editor seems to be working in the flow of the facts happening, at my side of things. 50.32.106.85 (talk) 13:58, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

You can identify with a state, basically how the article gets by like this, and linking the cities and states (or various other things) seemed like a more immersive article (or how that is designed to function) and I'm pretty sure Udupi is what we'd be advised to use here, but Mangalore is the location of a visit for some reason as Sini's latest social media happening scene followed by a like been up to lately kind of example. 74.37.6.184 (talk) 13:41, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

I was thinking it started out differently than with Innanje, as that's one I didn't even have as happening even after my last review. It gets linked here, also. If that's it, we'd seem to have blanked out a bit, until now at least for discussion? The birth date/birthday work was something we can be proud of as that plays out as not being how it was started. 50.107.165.15 (talk) 15:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Possibly a little premature in its declaration that it's a fact for in the article even if not verifiable through use of an inline citation - to revisit the first topic of how to improve the Sini Shetty article that was of interest to begin with - now it seems like the explanation that states it's just a matter of fact matter for inclusion, it being easily verifiable, is completely supported for those that understand what an influencer can be defined as? Social media use is that important for keeping up with some BLPs' noted feature requirements? As objective observations during discussion can veer off into "Wow" at times, it should be understandable for most to be able to avoid its distractions during working at improving the article, mainly for those that have been at it a while in working on the Sini Shetty BLP, and again focus on addressing this issue of is she or is she not an influencer and is it so obvious and important to the subject as to even be concurred upon that it needs no inline citation, as per their argument for its needed inclusion in the article that actually follows Wikipedia's rules at least for doing it once? Of course, some editors working this article have shut down all sort of verifiable angles that can be used to improve the article and have even deleted all content of the message board at times after analyzing a discussion's point that's like this, rather than include a nod to that we should try to be engaging as we work on the article also. 50.107.159.47 (talk) 14:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

:That would be how to do it, a heading in the article like is this topic? 50.107.165.188 (talk) 23:06, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

::Even with changing the picture, we can send some editor in with more than a pat on the back. 50.32.115.46 (talk) 13:31, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

:::To imbue the article far better with the latest mood, and it'd be original to have knowingly added to things, but I'd put her latest dance into the picture spot as its greeting to the readers that happen onto things here. 50.107.173.174 (talk) 13:45, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

::::It's vaster than what I like to contribute as being my objective observations of things, but it seems Sini Shetty's modern dance is by far forefront in its use? For those that might have interest, like with before, it just seems we're failing in notifying them of something notable except of what's left up to a browse of her talk page theory? I've seen little video clips in picture sections later in an article and imagine you can put a video clip in the main picture section also. 50.107.141.147 (talk) 15:24, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

:::::It's a phenomenon of its own as perspective is gained but their current Miss India then takes the role, of course? The organization, that I eventually just stated as professionals at a point in Sini Shetty's social media observations, even has Miss World in India this year again and has produced its winner in the past, like a known powerhouse maybe. They have this new potential queen of the world as Miss December in a calendar they've put together, as you can imagine, along with knowing some about Nikita Porwal's participation so far, as she's who won it this year. She immediately had a Wikipedia page established correctly. Also, they form a bit of a court in that there's three titles achieved, as usual? How she'd transition out of that professional context was my main study for this article's improvement in keeping up with how to understand Sini's social media use going forward as professionally it was very talented, to this point here where I just declared she's an influencer, which is vast in its participants and how/what gets done to try and objectively consider as far as what is what, as I also wanted to include a study of influencers for Wikipedia, as an interesting complex subject. 50.107.171.50 (talk) 14:02, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

::::::As it happened in part, the social aspect of social media had me initially focused on the back and forth that seemed a main feature for its well-known success as I pointed out for myself that you can be compelled to "talk" to the presentation and did an example of how that might go in a response to a caption for one of Sini's possible roles? A student, as it turned out speaking about eternity and it continued to secret rendezvous, doing this on the talk page, as you might imagine like even for this. It was flagged in some versions as a violation of how Wikipedia is intended and advised to do some other place, as its merits, continually found, were suspect to some, as you also can imagine? That said, the social part of social media is a complex opportunity. 50.32.143.184 (talk) 13:45, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

:::::::And as it's perceived/meant as just having fun in some ways, it seemed even as this objective observer joining in with the "Wow" type is fitting when called for, as keeping up with the participants also has to have merit in this asserted as possible Wikipedia project? 50.32.143.184 (talk) 14:14, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

::::::::An easy assumption is that gaining knowledge is a good thing or encouraged as was part of the schooling general atmosphere that can get created here, in Sini's example scene - as this goes for a project suggestion for on her talk page, that can include the development of a solid understanding of what an influencer is for use in the article as what would then be very appropriate to have in her article if having been proven to be the case, after all? At one point it got into self-actualization, Maslow's work, a search for the definition of holistic education, ending up with a much less popularized and according to the work very important peak experience Maslow calls the transpersonal after self-actualization. She was briefly the hot teacher maybe, too, or something to wonder about as she does seem to enjoy it and I concluded that even as an objective observer we'd be in one of her educational programs. 50.32.149.133 (talk) 12:39, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::You'd have to conclude, as was Sini's observation while doing the sort of practicum Beauty with a Purpose project, that personality emergence is interesting. Here, her transition included, you get the feeling she's going about her business as usual, kind of a recognition. It's a task, you'd have to imagine and along with dancing at times, her technique isn't as is many you'd run across as is their personality or situational idea. Sini has developed something or other for objective description but for now along the lines of this is her flow of personality at this? 50.32.110.175 (talk) 12:59, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::In some sense they are categorized among themselves and you can develop your own recognition of something being done around and as I've been here the silent "conversation" one can be worked at different levels now. There must be some yet to be discovered but when Sini tries a more kind of off the grid idea reel we'd notice and even with a shared technique individual traits have to be present as working it to another level maybe, more than something totally new. 50.107.175.3 (talk) 13:22, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::::Who have you been addressing this monologue to for the last five months? Sciencefish (talk) 20:16, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::::The part about how the new Miss India has a Wikipedia article was thought to be something of motivation/support for keeping/keeping at improving the article, so I'd say it's focused enough on how to improve the article but even as the influencer/social media use idea for inclusion is getting supported by it - so it being to the editing community at large, with other suggestions to improve the article still around top of mind, and is how it is to use the talk page correctly, so nothing unusual - unless an editor can find it contentious for themself somehow, then it would be another situation, it being now found a problem, unsurprisingly by you again, citing the Wikipedia talk page monologue rule? 50.32.144.211 (talk) 14:08, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::::::There's a monologue rule? Sciencefish (talk) 23:04, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::::::I remember it as one of your finds once that caught my attention. 50.32.97.12 (talk) 23:01, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::::::::Please remind me where I wrote that. Sciencefish (talk) 23:33, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::::::::Like this, I suggest it'd just be in the rules where to find it, if you're interested in the rule itself called monologue? 50.107.176.160 (talk) 22:55, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::::::::::There is nothing in WP:MOS or WP:TPG about monologuing, although there is WP:TALKNO does cover your activity (as nothing has ever resulted from this, or any consensus regarding the article). Sciencefish (talk) 10:02, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::::::::::You find this a violation of the "behavior that is unacceptable" ruling and not monologuing now? There's a lot to dig through as far as I can tell and a highlighted monologue section is how I kind of remember it being, for some reason, and I think it had some rationale to it as a violation. Are you planning to read that Wikipedia Dispute Resolution? It could have a procedure rather than how we'd kind of just wing it. 50.32.154.123 (talk) 22:42, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::::::::::::It could be part of why it goes on to you, because at least as is public facing for us at this of an assumed social media savvy nature BLP subject (as would then be very appropriate for in the article as I've tried to get in it at times or just discuss further continuing that should have its own section idea, I'm telling you), in this there's an even stated attempt of mine to try and be engaging all around, too, that, why my defense for that conflict of yours over it being in the category of what is probably just socially obvious of what's really noticeably off postings going on. If it's at least socially acceptable work at the article on that level, then this would seem not in violation of that major perceptually based claim of yours for us to try and agree with as the final decision in this latest topic going on here, to have even stayed on topic for, up to here, and clearly no longer another monologue now? 50.32.99.44 (talk) 00:05, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::::::::::::I agree it can go on like that, almost as a unique participatory angle of some sort socially too, and is suspect at its main purpose claimed to be for Wikipedia information dissemination work, and rather than in total being some complex propositions. 50.107.131.131 (talk) 12:40, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::::::::::::::As the latter, however, it could be even harder to resist as enjoying Maslow's work in this context and still stuck on the transpersonal experience (which interestingly can produce some varied outcomes to have to consider) while liking its mission statement of, in part, the responsible implementation of the finding relevant to then going on to list some peak experiences under its considerations/studies of, apparently emphasized as being tasked (in this case) by degreed psychology experts of a field, however, basically at one point just their try at it. At sorting it out, at some point being a possible concentration for students to be aware of but seemingly at an accessible point is at the very development or main experiences of what is to become the work, in progress. So that'd be fun to be doing, too? 50.32.113.2 (talk) 11:34, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::::::::::::::The course would have had to have been very successful for at least a month to suggest the thesis for the responsible implementation of "wow" as the finding, successfully, it'd seem to me. It would have to get included, you'd have to imagine, but it would be considered too simple an approach to any phenomenon at having it under empirical considerations. 50.107.179.236 (talk) 11:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

As it's a potentially linked Wikipedia article for a farfetched Sini Shetty article achievement one day, but in knowing this context for its discussion to find some relevance through out, having this section and instead of running long in the last one is an idea. Competitiveness aside (for a moment), his work is unusual for what it is like in his thought of it as its major force in academic psychology/mainstream psychology being in this his constructs of what constitutes peak experiences for human life (on topic at least, for the field of psychology). The famous pyramid is as it seems added to it later than what Maslow did, but he'd be outlining this sort of filter angle as at work systematically scientifically (these being questionable accountings of Maslow's success in total, however, maybe). 50.107.140.60 (talk) 12:56, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

:It's naturalistic observation in conjunction with humanistic psychology and transpersonal psychology, for what's been found to be a noncontentious assumption of it taking place here in a women's empowerment, somewhat focused on these experiences already general community, as what's working on Sini's article is like? It's an approach to the article or the general community she came to fame from within as what probably just rings true to some but not very directly attributed to them as an actual focus of theirs like this, as they may like it in how they really identify for themself in general, but not so far off as to not have any applicability for within their purposes or to maybe get published better about what's occurring with them. 50.32.157.119 (talk) 12:11, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

::Of course, being in the program(s) of whatever nature(s) (to be determined as its goals, maybe), even as an observer it's not clear cut you'd know what you are observing/doing, a naturalistic part of naturalistic observation/participation as that gets included at this also as stated as even socially? Looking at it like this lately, they literally have their new queen at some peaks in what they trekked to for its location and in part was presented as going to a real location for this. The resulted success in her calendar shot (as I once noted about here already as her Miss December) was pinned to the first spot on Nikita's Instagram and while seemingly a very silent situation with her, next to it can be of interest and the latest one there now under it captions a thought about her heart some, a possible subject she'd come up with first eventually here now, this as a sort of how to work it with this stuff example of maybe even to go along with it. This as one of Sini's latest has her caption about having her heart going in one situation and a caption about trouble in every strand in her last caption (as I'd keep up like this here as timely, too). What can you make of it, outside any known programs at too much beyond just a lot of fun in some ways is how I'll end up on it with a "wow" sometimes, too. 74.47.121.149 (talk) 11:34, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

:::You can be too tempted to keep the pace of being even more timely than how the last one was, as this one is nearly happening together as its opportunity can arise like this - if you have a thought that could be studied on how its next might have gone over too. You can make of it here next as a continuation of one of Sini's situations and have some reassurance for her that she's surely got this like that, something they do among themselves some or gets found around as fun to hear? 50.107.128.195 (talk) 15:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

::::Of course, Miss World and in India for a second time in a row really is the main event now as it starts up shortly, to be aware of and not to be allowed to get too concerned with related to Sini like this now but on the asserted social level something to be about here as at least noticing properly, like the merit ideas a little if concerned with possible others, in having been doing this in this context so while maybe showing some fun of the last time this happened (I was pretty active like this during Miss World in India last year and edited into the article successfully eventually Sini's standings at the end of it, that became a stable version of the article even until it was removed lately by that one editor that's like that against unsourced material inserted as easily verifiable content - these being Sini's Miss World outcome from last year being published at Wikipedia too, but not now)? You have to get caught up in the program, maybe even as a naturalistic observer sometimes, in what is being observed as its main draw of the experience for those that are participating as totally caught up (in this case) the Miss World festival/competition part of this in any manner participants (and it could be assumed a higher yet peak experience in it). 50.32.112.178 (talk) 12:24, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Having her latest dance in the photo spot could really relate a current mood to look over the article through? Dance having its own heading in this article isn't too farfetched a current idea but stated about as a main feature in a social media use heading section would have been smooth editing to have accomplished. 50.32.113.115 (talk) 15:09, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

:It's still another losing side of editors' differences over what's a verifiability style, but as an aside, I thought just by participating in the festival/competition, with Sini's article a prototype for its allowable use, they're fashion models, at least and you can easily verify fashion modeling work (in their social media use to start, maybe) and there's a major runway event having designer awards that they of course are its model happening at Miss World, but model eventually got removed for a while now. This assertion as a requirement of a base of a pyramid of a possible similar sort even to Maslow's study in that I think you can almost guarantee their next Miss World will reflect some actualized nature as they sort through it in some method they are using but as you experience its progression it seems a part of what got all of them this far in this competition so much so that I found the experiences of the festival itself relevant to Maslow's work at the time. 50.107.152.9 (talk) 11:52, 11 May 2025 (UTC)