Talk:Sky Sword I

{{Discussion top|result=The result of this discussion was to combine the two articles. Adamgerber80 (talk) 08:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)}}

There is not enough on both these systems to justify individual pages. Adamgerber80 (talk) 04:08, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

: I'm inclined to agree... It would also align the format with the Sky Bow page merlinVtwelve (talk) 05:44, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

{{Discussion bottom}}

{{Discussion top|result=Unanimous split. - BilCat (talk) 02:08, 18 July 2020 (UTC)}}

I propose that this article be split back into two separate pages called Sky Sword I and Sky Sword II. These are two completely different types of missiles, one being based on the Sidewinder, and the other on the Sparrow. I'm sorry I missed the original discussion, and would certainly been against it at the time had I known about it. The merge should never have happened. BilCat (talk) 23:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

{{ping|Adamgerber80|MerlinVtwelve|Horse Eye Jack}} - BilCat (talk) 23:15, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

:I agree the merge should never have happened, it makes no sense. They’re completely different missile families with basically no commonalities. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 23:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

:: Agreed, shouldn't have been merged. I was on a long WikiBreak and missed this one altogether. merlinVtwelve (talk) 23:44, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

::*Actually, you supported merging in the discussion above. That's why I pinged you. - BilCat (talk) 23:49, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

::: Support OK...apologies...so I did. Don't know what I was thinking. I will disagree with myself and support this proposal to split. merlinVtwelve (talk) 00:22, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

::::No worries. Merging small articles is a good idea if the items are somewhat related, and these names do imply a close relationship. - BilCat (talk) 00:28, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

• Comment - Adamgerber80 is no longer active on Wikipedia, so I don't expect a response from him. I've notified WT:AIR of the discussion, so I'm waiting a few days to see if we get any objections. BilCat (talk) 23:53, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
• Support Yes, these are pretty distinct weapons. Nick-D (talk) 00:00, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
• Support - yes please split them back! - Ahunt (talk) 00:37, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
• Support - We all make mistakes. - ZLEA _T\^C 03:13, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
• Support - Two years of being two independent topics with duplicate structures is two years too long. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 07:43, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

{{Discussion bottom}}