Talk:Slimelight

{{Old XfD multi| date = 19 January 2010 (UTC) | result = keep | page = Slimelight}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|

{{WikiProject London|importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Electronic music|importance=low}}

}}

Old discussion

I have removed the link to http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/visual_arts/article5174749.ece titled "Article on the "restaurant/club" art installation at Electrowerkz" as it requires paid registration to view.

Longest running nightclub- since when?

  • it doesnt say longest running nightclub,it says longest running goth club --Steeev 07:08, 25 Nov 2003 (UTC)

the part about how the club was named is confusing. Why was it named slimelight because it was held in a church? surely the more plausible explanation is because it was a parody of the Limelight club. Personally i've always been told that it was as a parody, but if anyone knows for definite, could they please correct the article.

:the limelight was held inside a converted church --MilkMiruku 21:42, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Licencing hours

Edited this page to correct the times they serve alcohol as the site states: "Yes we have a bar on each floor which serve alcohol untill 2am, then continue to serve soft drinks, tea & coffee untill 7.15am."

:I presume the website is out of date - I've heard from numerous places that it's been extended. Unfortunately I can't find the link to the news article I read on the matter, but I did find this [http://www.islington.gov.uk/democracy/documents/getdoc_ext.asp?DocID=36907]. Mdwh 22:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

slimes

i added a note about the club being refered to as slimes. a [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=slimelight+slimes&btnG=Google+Search search] shows up many results for this, although there arn't as many results for the other name i've heard quite often, "slime shite" ;) --MilkMiruku 14:07, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

:well, [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&c2coff=1&q=slimeshite&btnG=Search "slimeshite"] gets 185 ;D --MilkMiruku

::I've removed the "slimeshite" part of the name until someone can verify it. Those google hits seemed to all be either forums or unrelated, so I don't see any reliable sources. - Zeibura S. Kathau (Info | Talk) 20:16, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

:::But if you do a joint google on [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&c2coff=1&safe=off&q=slimeshite+slimelight "slimeshite" and "slimelight"], you get a fair number of hits (119) which seem to come from the goth community ... Relevant? Mebbee. Daen (talk) 23:52, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

PoV

I just removed "and whilst it retains it's name, the original spirit has long since been dillutted by the current crop" from the paragraph about the founders. ƕ (talk) 18:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Plane nose section

There was a nose section of a plane down in the "smoking yard" when I visited on Saturday, 10 May 2008. Does anyone have any information as to what type of plane it comes from? Details like that make for a more interesting article (and coincidentally sate my curiosity :-) Daen (talk) 23:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

: There is some good background [http://islingtonmetal.com/about.html on the venue's website], and on the [http://www.londonscrapmetal.com/hire.html venue's "other" website] -- it's a scrap metal recycling plant in the daytime! About a year ago, as a one-off, you could pay for entry to Slimelight (normally £5 for members, £8 for non-members) with a few kilos of unwanted power cables. Some of the more interesting scrap is kept around for use when the venue's used as a film set. ƕ (talk) 22:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Sources, and Electrowekz

It is unfortunate that the article was essentially blanked last November, as a number of news sources can now be found on the internet following the death of the club's founder, Mayuan Mak, in December. I don't blame the editor at all, it was done in good faith, and they can't be expected to have a crystal ball. It's just unfortunate.

Rather than restore any of the page as-is, I would suggest that the article be merged with the Electrowerkz article, as has been suggested in the past. It is I think impossible to separate the two, especially looking at the recent sources that have appeared.

I know it is unlikely any editors will see this, but I thought I would make this note on the talk page here before I look at the article history (to preserve the original text for re-writing and referencing) and the proper procedure for merging. H. Carver (talk) 23:47, 27 January 2021 (UTC)