Talk:Smartsheet

{{edit COI|A}}

The current article has some promotionalism that is typically indicative of conflicted editing. The lead focuses excessively on customers, it has a dedicated section for Awards and the Features section just lists features, instead of providing a summary and description based on reliable sources.

I've put a draft together at Talk:Smartsheet/draft that I would like to suggest as a proposed replacement for the current article that would correct this. It would also make the article more up-to-date, better sourced, more comprehensive, etc. I would also like to add some images and a short video, but will have to work those out later for copyright reasons. David King, Ethical Wiki (Talk) 18:30, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

:I took a look at the draft. It is indeed significantly better than what was there. I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASmartsheet%2Fdraft&type=revision&diff=693193694&oldid=689061009 made some copyedits] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Smartsheet&diff=693194149&oldid=642558367 swapped it in]. {{ping|CorporateM}} what do you typically do with the drafts? history merge? — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:17, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

::{{ping|Rhododendrites}} Thanks for reviewing! Regarding the technical process of how the draft is merged, I'm indifferent.

::If you care to review any others, I'm always scrounging for an editor to look at this kind of stuff.

::I'll get started on squaring away the images on this page, starting with the logo. David King, Ethical Wiki (Talk) 02:52, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

{{Talk:Smartsheet/GA1}}

It's been almost two years since I brought this page up to GA status with the help of {{ping|Rhododendrites}}. Since then the company has raised more funding, its user base has doubled, and new sources have been published. I have placed some suggested updates to the page at Talk:Smartsheet/draft that would bring the page up to date and would like to request an unaffiliated editor consider incorporating them if they improve the article.

I am hesitant as to whether the lawsuit with Amazon (included in the draft) warrants inclusion and leave it up to the editor reviewing. From what I can tell, Smartsheet did prompt the lawsuit by offering to hire an Amazon employee but was not otherwise substantially involved in the litigation or settlement that was between Amazon and the Smartsheet employee. CorporateM (Talk) 21:35, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

: {{Reply to|CorporateM}} I've updated the article. I left out the lawsuit since Smartsheet wasn't directly involved, only an employee. — JJMC89 (T·C) 18:17, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

{{edit COI|P|Please see the Reply entry below for more information about your request.}}

Requesting a few minor updates located at Talk:Smartsheet/draft, which includes three revisions:

• Update employee count
• Add a recent acquisition
• Add that it started a user conference

Thank you in advance for your time and attention in helping keep the article up to date.

CorporateM (Talk) 16:58, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

{{PImplemented}}

1. Even though an article on software, information on the employee count and acquisition was added.
2. Information on their customer conference — curiously labeled as a user conference — was declined, as it promotes a sales event.
   

:Regards, Spintendo ᔦᔭ 19:24, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Smartsheet/1}}

Vendors call it "work management".

https://www.smartsheet.com/

So, wouldn't it be better to change the expression to "work management"? Mocha c jp (talk) 14:39, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

:No. They're synonyms. We can use word we actually have an article for. MrOllie (talk) 14:47, 26 November 2022 (UTC)