Talk:Sphaerotheca fuliginea/sandbox

The taxonomy of this species in biological nomenclature has frequently changed from 1819 to the late 20th century. As recently as the 1980s P. xanthii had been considered a synonymous with, variously Sphaerotheca phaseoli (or S. astragali var. phaseoli), S. cucurbitae, or S. fuliginea (as well as Euoidium erysiphoides), with Podosphaera and Sphaerotheca principally distinguished "by having appendages which are branched and simple, respectively".{{cite journal |title=Phylogeny of Erysiphe, Microsphaera, Uncinula (Erysipheae) and Cistotheca, Podosphaera, Sphaerotheca (Cystotheceae) inferred from rDNA ITS sequences – some taxonomic consequences |first1=Uwe|last1=Braun |first2=Susumu|last2=Takamatsu |date=2000 |journal=Schlechtendalia |volume=4 |pages=1–33 |publisher=International Association for Lichenology |url= http://public.bibliothek.uni-halle.de/index.php/schlechtendalia/article/download/291/296 |format=PDF |accessdate=10 August 2015}} However, based on rDNA evidence, these genera were merged in 2000–2001,{{cite journal |title=The name of the cucurbit powdery mildew: Podosphaera (sect. Sphaerotheca) xanthii Castag. (U. Braun & N. Shish.) comb. nov. [abstract] |first=Nina|last=Shishkoff |journal=Phytopathology |date=June 2000 |volume=90 |issue=6 Supplement |page=S133}} Originally presented at the 2000 Potomac Division Meeting of the American Phytopathology Society.{{cite journal |title=Phylogeny of Podosphaera sect. Sphaerotheca subsect. Magnicellulatae (Sphaerotheca fuliginea auct. s.lat.) inferred from rDNA ITS sequences – a taxonomic interpretation |first1=Uwe|last1=Braun |first2=Nina|last2=Shishkoff |first3=Susumu|last3=Takamatsu |date=2001 |journal=Schlechtendalia |volume=7 |pages=45–52 |url=http://public.bibliothek.uni-halle.de/index.php/schlechtendalia/article/viewFile/307/312 |accessdate=10 August 2015}} and the P. xanthii and S. fuliginea species, along with P. phaseoli, were consequently merged, in full combinatio nova form as Podosphaera (sect. Sphaerotheca) xanthii.

Since 2008, some have suggested merging P. xanthii into P. fusca, and they have been labelled synonymous, with P. fusca being the senior name.{{cite journal |title=The powdery mildew fungus Podosphaera fusca (synonym Podosphaera xanthii), a constant threat to cucurbits |last1=Pérez-García|first1=A.|last2=Romero|first2= D. |last3=Fernández-Ortuño|first3=D. |last4=López-Ruiz|first4=F. |last5=De Vicente|first5=A. |last6=Torés Montosa|first6=Juan Antonio |journal=Molecular Plant Pathology |volume=10 |issue=2 |pages=153–160 |date=March 2009 |doi=10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00527.x}} First published online 9 December 2008, {{doi|10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00527.x}}. Other sources, relying on the 2000–2001 rDNA work, consider them separate species in the Magnicellulatae subsection of the Sphaerotheca section of Podosphaera, {{as of|lc=y|2011}}, based on the size of chasmothecia, and on the thin-walled portion of the asci (oculus).{{cite journal |title=Podosphaera xanthii but not Golovinomyces cichoracearum infects Cucurbits in a Greenhouse at Salinas, California |first1=Cosme|last1=Bojorques Ramos |first2=Karunakaran|last2=Maruthachalam |first3=James D.|last3=McCreight |first4=Raymundo S.|last4=Garcia Estrada |journal=Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Report |volume=33–34 |issue=24–28 |date=2010–2011 |pages=24–26 |url= http://cuke.hort.ncsu.edu/cgc/cgc3334/cgc3334-7.pdf |ps= |accessdate=10 August 2015}}

There are multiple races of the fungus, identified simply as race 1, race 2, etc. (seven in total by 2004), for races found around the world, and an additional race N1 through N4 for some divergent races native to Japan.{{cite journal |title=Monitoring Physiological races of Podosphaera xanthii (syn. Sphaerotheca fuliginea), the Causal Agent of Powdery Mildew in Curcubits: Factors Affecting Race Identification and the Importance for Research and Commerce |first1=R.|last1=Cohen |first2=Y.|last2=Burger| first3=N.|last3=Katzir |date=2004 |journal=Phythoparasitica |volume=32 |issue=2 |pages=174–183 |url= http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02979784#page-1 |accessdate=10 August 2015}} Various subraces have been identified, and given names such as race 2U.S., race 3.5, and race 4.5.{{cite journal |title=Inheritance of Resistance in Melon PI 313970 to Cucurbit Powdery Mildew Incited by Podosphaera xanthii Race S |first1=James D.|last1=McCreight |first2=Michael D.|last2=Coffey |journal=HortScience |date=June 2011 |volume=46 |number=6 |pages=838–840 |url= http://hortsci.ashspublications.org/content/46/6/838.full |accessdate=10 August 2015}} A new race S was discovered in 2003, and melon cultivars are being backcrossed to increase resistance to it.

A 2004 literature review regarding powdery mildew races that parasitize various cucurbit plants {{crossref|printworthy=y|(see below)}} concluded that "race identification is important for basic research and is especially important for the commercial seed industry, which requires accuracy in declaring the type and level of resistance ... in its products". However, identifying specific races was seen as having little utility in horticulture for choosing specific cultivars, because of the rapidity with which the local pathogen population can change geographically, seasonally, and by host plant.

Classification and taxonomy of these fungal races can be difficult, because host plants' responses to particular populations of fungi can be affected by humidity, light, temperature, and other environmental factors; different host plants may not all respond to particular fungal populations or vice versa; and genetic differences between populations thought to form distinct fungal races can be elusive.

Powdery mildew is manifest on the plant by white powdery fungal growth on the surface of the leaf; usually both sides of the leaf show fungal growth. The host tissue is frequently stunted, distorted, discolored, and scarred.Glawe, D.A., Grove, G.G., 2010. "Powdery Mildew Diseases". http://plant-disease.ippc.orst.edu/articles.cfm?article_id=30 The fruit of infected plants are usually smaller and the flavor is affected negatively, as fewer sugars and solids are stored in the fruit.Trigiano, R.N., Windham, M.T., Windham, A.S., 2008. Plant Pathology: Concepts and Laboratory Exercises, 2nd Edition. CRC Press.

P. xanthii uses haustoria to gain access to the leaf epidermal cells. The fungus is usually spread during the spring through mycelium from infected plant, or through ascocarps. Signs appear after three to seven days of infection, if conditions are favorable for the fungus. The mycelium grows rapidly during the warm summer months, with an optimum temperature of about 50–90 degrees F.Doubrava, N, et al. 2007. "Cucumber, Squash, Melon & Other Cucurbit Diseases".

http://www.clemson.edu/extension/hgic/pests/plant_pests/veg_fruit/hgic2206.html

The leaves are most susceptible 16–23 days after unfolding.Cheah, L.H., et al. 1996. "Epidemiology of Powdery Mildew (Sphaerotheca fuliginea) of Squash". http://www.nzpps.org/journal/49/nzpp_491470.pdf High humidity favors the development of disease, but infection can occur at relative humidity as low a 50%. The conidia of the fungus are spread through the air and thus can travel over great distances.Webster, J., Weber, R.W.S., 2007. Introduction to Fungi 3rd Edition. Cambridge University Press. 401-413 The mycelium can also overwinter in the buds of infected plants.

The most common way to control the spread of P. xanthii is with the use of fungicides. Usually sulfur-based or demethylation-inhibitor fungicides are applied. Fungicides are usually applied once a week. Plants are also kept physically separated to control spread because older plants can be a source of conidia.

{{Main|Powdery mildew#Gourds and melons}}

Since 1925, commercial Cucumis melo (cantaloup and muskmelon) production has been engaged in a biological "arms race" against the disease cucurbit powdery mildew (CPM) caused by P. xanthii in particular, with new cultivars of melons being developed for resistance to successively arising races of the fungus.

• [http://www.speciesfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp Species Fungorum] database; Index Fungorum project of Landcare Research and Kew Royal Botanic Gardens
• [http://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases U.S. National Fungus Collections Fungal Database]; Agricultural Research Service of the Department of Agriculture

{{Reflist}}