Login
Login

Talk:Star Wars (film)

{{Skip to talk}}

{{Talk header}}

{{Article history

|action1=GAN

|action1date=02:53, 3 September 2006

|action1link=

|action1result=listed

|action1oldid=73507187

|action2=PR

|action2date=22:14, 4 September 2006

|action2link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope/archive1

|action2result=reviewed

|action2oldid=73811197

|action3=FAC

|action3date=20:42, 7 September 2006

|action3link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope/archive1

|action3result=not promoted

|action3oldid=74372879

|action4=FTC

|action4date=22:31, 15 October 2006

|action4link=Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Star Wars episodes/archive1

|action4result=promoted

|action4oldid=81538790

|action5=FAC

|action5date=04:30, 3 December 2006

|action5link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope/archive2

|action5result=promoted

|action5oldid=91678694

|action6=FTR

|action6date=14 January 2008

|action6link=Wikipedia:Featured topic removal candidates/Star Wars episodes/archive1

|action6result=demoted

|action6oldid=184182053

|action7=FTC

|action7date=17 April 2008

|action7link=Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Star Wars episodes

|action7result=passed

|action7oldid=206204929

|action8=FAR

|action8date=00:19, 11 October 2010

|action8link=Wikipedia:Featured article review/Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope/archive1

|action8result=removed

|action8oldid=389848951

|action9=GAN

|action9date=22:47, 6 August 2012

|action9link=Talk:Star Wars (film)/GA1

|action9result=not listed

|action9oldid=506092312

|currentstatus=FFA

|maindate=May 25, 2007

|otddate=2008-05-25|otdoldid=214758884

|otd2date=2009-05-25|otd2oldid=292163546

|otd3date=2011-05-25|otd3oldid=430801655

|otd4date=2016-04-17|otd4oldid=715350775

|otd5date=2017-05-25|otd5oldid=782163541

|otd6date=2018-04-17|otd6oldid=836913006

|topic=film

|otd7date=2023-04-17|otd7oldid=1150286506

|otd8date=2024-04-17|otd8oldid=1219198384

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=b|vital=yes|1=

{{WikiProject Star Wars|importance=top}}

{{WikiProject Film|core=yes|American-task-force=yes|British-task-force=yes}}

{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|USFilm=yes|USFilm-importance=top}}

{{WikiProject Library of Congress|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Science Fiction|importance=Top}}

{{WikiProject California|importance=mid}}

{{WikiProject Disney|importance=mid}}

{{WikiProject 20th Century Studios|importance=High}}

{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Deadbeef|date=27 December 2014|old-user-1=Onel5969|old-date-1=12 May 2014}}

}}

{{old moves| collapse = true|list=

}}

{{Top 25 report|Dec 13 2015 (9th)|Dec 20 2015 (13th)|Dec 27 2015 (24th)|Jan 1 2017 (23rd)}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}

|maxarchivesize = 150K

|counter = 11

|minthreadsleft = 4

|minthreadstoarchive = 2

|algo = old(120d)

|archive = Talk:Star Wars (film)/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{Film references for use}}

Inaccuracy in the intro

The intro says "Luke Skywalker acquires stolen architectural plans of the Death Star and sets out to rescue her". He sets out to Alderan to deliver the plans to Leia's father. He sneaks aboard the Death Star, finds out she's there, and then sets out to rescue her.

2600:8807:5400:7000:169:3A35:6C8:7ABF (talk) 22:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

Article issues and classification

:This article appears to be well sourced but it is in the category "Articles lacking reliable references from March 2024". The B-class criteria (#1) states: {{tq|The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited.}}

:There are currently eight links in the "External links" section. None is needed for article promotion.

  • ELpoints #3) states: {{tq|Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.}}
  • LINKFARM states: {{tq|There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.}}
  • ELMIN: {{tq|Minimize the number of links}}.

: Other:

  • External links This page in a nutshell: {{tq|External links in an article can be helpful to the reader, but they should be kept minimal, meritable, and directly relevant to the article. With rare exceptions, external links should not be used in the body of an article.}}
  • Second paragraph, {{tq|acceptable external links include those that contain further research that is accurate and on-topic, information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail, or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy.}}
  • Please note:
  • WP:ELBURDEN: {{tq|Disputed links should be excluded by default unless and until there is a consensus to include them}}.

:I do not see that TCM Movie Database or AllMovie adding anything "extra" according to External links guidelines. -- Otr500 (talk) 15:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello

Does anyone know about my edits to this page? Icecreammaniac3.0 (talk) 13:32, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Laws in Britain

wouldn't say it was laws that meant they had to finish at 5:30pm. Would update this to "Union rules meant...." 217.155.12.96 (talk) 02:54, 15 February 2025 (UTC)