Talk:Stephen Baskerville
{{Old AfD multi| date = 23 February 2010 (UTC) | result = keep | page = Stephen Baskerville }}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|listas=Baskerville, Stephen|blp=yes|
{{WikiProject Biography|s&a-work-group=yes|s&a-priority=}}
{{WikiProject Men's Issues}}
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Conservatism|importance=low|needs-image=yes}}
}}
"Parents Have a Right to the Care, Custody, and Companionship of Their Children"
I am adding a link to a YouTube video of [http://no-pasaran.blogspot.com/2010/02/expose-of-family-court-system-parents.html Professor Baskerville giving testimony] to the National Press Club in August 2007, which has the benefit of giving a summary of his viewpoints in less than three minutes. The Family Court System is "an abuse of government power … virtually 100%".
"The cures for this", the author of Taken Into Custody adds, are "a presumption of shared parenting" as well as "an act that will preserve, that will codify the ancient, very ancient recognition in the common law — in this country and in the English common law — that parents have a right to the care, custody, and companionship of their children and to supervise their upbringing; this is decades, if not centuries of case law … it's simply common sense…" Asteriks (talk) 12:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Point of View Issues
I have tried to tone down the rhetoric in the piece. It might be good for someone who has not read a book by Baskerville to go through and look over the piece, and try to removed loaded words. Those who have read Taken Into Custody, as I have, have a hard time not being overly wroght about the whole issue.John Pack Lambert 16:27, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
"a leading authority on divorce, child custody and the family court system."
Could somebody tell me why Paul Craig Roberts is considered an expert opinion (or even a reliable source) for the claim that Baskerville is "a leading authority on divorce, child custody and the family court system." Roberts comes across as more than a little of a WP:FRINGE figure. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 08:14, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
On a related issue, do we have any indication that Baskerville has attracted any notice outside of the American far right? HrafnTalkStalk(P) 08:51, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Faith & Reason lecture
Baskerville's Faith & Reason lecture has generated some press, although it seems to mostly be in partisan and/or self-published sources.[http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/09/18/christian-college-blames-feminists-for-unjustly-jailing-rapists-and-child-abusers/][http://www.patrolmag.com/2013/09/14/david-sessions/a-response-to-stephen-baskervilles-lecture-at-patrick-henry-college/][http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/patrick-henry-college-speaker-excuses-rape-blames-mass-incarceration-feminists][
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on Stephen Baskerville. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=730724080 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120222232315/http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/guestlist.php to http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/guestlist.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)