Talk:Street Roots#Tag
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Journalism |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Newspapers |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Oregon |importance=Low}}
}}
{{Connected contributor (paid)
| checked =
| User1 =Israel Bayer| U1-employer = Street Roots| U1-client =| U1-EH = yes | U1-banned =no | U1-otherlinks =
| User2 =Street Roots| U2-employer = Street Roots | U2-client =| U2-EH = yes | U2-banned =no | U2-otherlinks =
}}
funding
{{ping|Peteforsyth}}, would you object to rephrasing "Leadership of both Street Roots and SAFE disavowed any editorial influence connected with the grant, focusing on the two organizations' shared commitment to "providing a service for the homeless." into reading "Exceutive director of Street Roots disavowed any editorial influence connected with the grant. Two organizations share commitment to "providing a service for the homeless." ? Unless I missed something, I am not seeing anything in the Willamette Week article indicating SAFE leadership took any position on the editorial matter. Graywalls (talk) 15:25, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
: I phrased it that way due to this paragraph in the WW article:
:: Chisek, a non-voting member of the SAFE committee, says moderating Street Roots ’ editorial stance wasn’t a consideration. “Understandably, it seems like it would be an awkward position for Street Roots ,” Chisek says. However, he adds, the committee and Street Roots shared a common purpose: providing a service for the homeless.
: -Pete Forsyth (talk) 22:04, 18 April 2019 (UTC)