Talk:Telepathy
{{annual readership}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Paranormal|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Parapsychology}}
{{WikiProject Skepticism|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Science fiction|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors |user=Otheus |date=19 April 2007}}
}}
{{ArbComPseudoscience}}
{{Controversial}}
{{Broken anchors|links=
Synthetic telepathy The anchor (Synthetic telepathy/silent communication) has been deleted.
}}
"[[:Tapping into oneness]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tapping_into_oneness&redirect=no Tapping into oneness] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 31#Tapping into oneness}} until a consensus is reached. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 09:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Concept preceded name by 14 years
Fourteen years before "telepathy" was coined, the substance of it was described in the British magazine Spectator: https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-burlington-free-press-before-telepa/170474962/ I propose to revise the history accordingly.Cpacker666 (talk) 23:45, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
:I doubt that the above was the first time such a theory had been proposed, but regardless, we don't base article content on our own analysis of old newspaper clippings. Not relevant to article content without coverage in WP:RS to indicate this particular clipping is of any significance. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:05, 17 April 2025 (UTC)