Talk:The Beatles#Template removal

{{Talk header}}

{{Article history

|action1=FAC

|action1date=2004-05-30, 13:39:51

|action1link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Beatles/archive1

|action1result=passed

|action1oldid=3784789

|action2=FAR

|action2date=09:54, 29 August 2006

|action2link=Wikipedia:Featured article review/The Beatles/archive1

|action2result=removed

|action2oldid=72577242

|action3=GAN

|action3date=20:01, 29 August 2006

|action3link=Talk:The Beatles/Archive 8#Win, lose, I don't know

|action3result=passed

|action3oldid=72671416

|action4=GAR

|action4date=16:42, 5 February 2007

|action4link=Talk:The Beatles/Archive 12#Result of the GAR

|action4result=kept

|action4oldid=105813598

|action5=PR

|action5date=01:43, 26 April 2008

|action5link=Wikipedia:Peer review/The Beatles/archive1

|action5result=reviewed

|action5oldid=207650552

|action6=PR

|action6date=08:30, 9 June 2008

|action6link=Wikipedia:Peer review/The Beatles/archive2

|action6result=reviewed

|action6oldid=218115253

|action7=PR

|action7date=20:52, 16 November 2008

|action7link=Wikipedia:Peer review/The Beatles/archive3

|action7result=reviewed

|action7oldid=252159423

|action8=GAR

|action8date=16:02, 3 June 2009

|action8link=/GA1

|action8result=kept

|action8oldid=294191579

|action9=FAC

|action9date=18:48, 26 September 2009

|action9link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Beatles/archive2

|action9result=failed

|action9oldid=316345517

|action10=FAC

|action10date=18:51, 3 November 2009

|action10link=Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Beatles/archive3

|action10result=passed

|action10oldid=323736820

|currentstatus=FA

|maindate=June 18, 2004

|maindate2=July 7, 2017

|otddate=2009-09-26

|otdoldid=316366605

|otd2date=2010-09-26

|otd2oldid=387169415

|topic=music

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=FA|vital=yes|listas=Beatles, The|1=

{{WikiProject The Beatles|importance=Top|apple=yes|john=yes|paul=yes|george=yes|ringo=yes|epstein=yes|martin=yes|display=Beatles}}

{{WikiProject Biography|core=yes|musician-work-group=yes|musician-priority=Top}}

{{WikiProject Rock music|importance=Top}}

{{WikiProject Merseyside|importance=top}}

{{WikiProject England|importance=top}}

{{WikiProject Pop music|importance=top}}

{{WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia}}

| blp=yes

}}

{{Press|collapsed=yes|date=August 17, 2009 |url= http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/6043534/The-50-most-viewed-Wikipedia-articles-in-2009-and-2008.html |title=The 50 most-viewed Wikipedia articles in 2009 and 2008 |org=The Daily Telegraph

|date2=October 12, 2012 |url2=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444657804578048534112811590.html#articleTabs%3Darticle |title2= Editors Won't Let It Be When It Comes to 'the' or 'The' |org2=The Wall Street Journal

|date3=January 2013 |url3=http://harpers.org/archive/2013/01/help-2/ |title3=Help! |org3=Harper's Magazine}}

{{Consensus|The consensus, per the closures of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_mediation/The_Beatles#Closure this RfC] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/The_Beatles this RfM], is to use "the Beatles" mid-sentence.}}

{{banner holder|collapsed=yes|

{{All time pageviews|112}}

{{Annual report|2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010}}

{{Top 25 Report|Feb 9 2014 (24th)|Nov 28 2021 (22nd)}}

{{Annual readership}}

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{tan}}

|maxarchivesize = 125K

|counter = 35

|minthreadsleft = 4

|algo = old(30d)

|archive = Talk:The Beatles/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn

|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes

}}

Missing: How Epstein's attention was drawn to the Beatles

I wonder why this story is not told here, where a lad requested "My Bonnie by the Beatles" to Epstein in his NEMS record store? Was it just never mentioned yet, or was it mentioned but deleted because it was considered too anecdotal? The story is told in the wiki article: The Beatles in Hamburg J.Moondog (talk) 10:21, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

:if there are no objections, I will work on the addition of the aforementioned story. J.Moondog (talk) 16:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

:I just realized that this missing section is oddly found complete in the article "The Beatles in Hamburg". I wrote in the "Talk" of that article that I was planning to move it from the Hamburg article to the main article, here, J.Moondog (talk) 05:58, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Question to revisor @Tkbrett: why massive revert?

Hi Tkbrett, Strange that all of a sudden, after close to a week, a massive revert was performed without explanation, with a vague reason that it was not readable enough? Can you explain? J.Moondog (talk) 03:58, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

:It isn't strange at all; this is a Featured Article where the standard for writing is higher. Your edits introduced arbitrary paragraph and section breaks which made it less readable. In another case, you added an unsourced one-sentence paragraph. Tkbrett (✉) 15:20, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Make that Eight Grammys

We can update that total to eight now that they picked up their latest for "Now and Then".

https://www.grammy.com/artists/beatles/16293

https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/03/entertainment/the-beatles-grammys-2025/index.html

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/grammys-2025-beatles-rolling-stones-win-b2691115.html

https://www.theverge.com/news/604970/beatles-ai-restored-song-now-and-then-grammy-win 131.193.45.228 (talk) 22:21, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Can we change the image

File:The Beatles 1963.jpg|Proposed

File:The Beatles members at New York City in 1964.jpg|Current

File:The Beatles arrive at JFK Airport.jpg|Original

Similar to other bands' Wikipedia images, the image of the Beatles should not be a square of combined images. Rather, it should be an image showing all of them together. Therefore, I propose an image of the Beatles in 1963, which is posed and shows all of them in their most iconic look. This image, aside from being a better image than the current, represents the Beatles in the way everyone remembers, similarly to the current. They are all smiling and looking at the camera too, so it does not look as awkward as the current. Thoughts? Wcamp9 (talk) 17:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

:I'm all for switching to the proposed image if the copyright concerns are cleared up. I also talk page messaged you on Commons as I can't find the image in the source link given. Miklogfeather (talk) 20:36, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

:This has been discussed briefly a few times before; see here, here, here, and here. The problem usually is a copyright issue, if you are able to prove that this image is PD it shouldn't be a problem to change it (though it may require an RfC). Yeshivish613 (talk) 21:17, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

:The proposed image has been nominated for deletion. The uploader indicated it was published in 2014, though the PD justification requires it was published in the US between 1930 and 1963. Tkbrett (✉) 08:38, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Categories

I vigorously reject the idea that the Beatles were a "rock" band. They were a "pop group". Some of their tracks were quite 'heavy', but that's not true of most of them. The first line of the article should be changed. 217.155.97.203 (talk) 22:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

:they are a pop rock band Foxboy716 (talk) 18:16, 17 April 2025 (UTC)