Talk:Trader Joe's unions/GA1
GA Review
{{Good article tools}}
Reviewer: Shushugah (talk · contribs) 05:13, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
= Initial comments =
Hello, am looking forward to reviewing this. I will go over all the criteria, but first wanted to mention some points that immediately stood out to me
- The main lede does not adequately mention the two NY drives or Kentucky drive, and it's easy detail to miss. A summary of 5 union drives, 3 successful or something like that would be great.
- Many highly technical terms like collective bargaining, union certification, independent union could be wikilinked etc...
- Contextualizing Littler Mendelson as known anti-union firm would be useful but not mandatory
- Trader Joe's employs 50,000 employees,{{Cite news |last=Scheiber |first=Noam |date=2022-10-28 |title=Workers at Trader Joe’s in Brooklyn Reject Union |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/28/business/economy/trader-joes-brooklyn-union.html |access-date=2023-01-10 |issn=0362-4331}} across its 530 stores.
Content wise, I came to suggest adding the recent union-drives and also 2016 attempt, but I see those were added already. Will add more final review soon
{{Talk-reflist}}
= Reply =
Thanks! I was looking to avoid putting a tally/counter in the lede that would need to be updated each time, partially because there is no "count" of union drives (many of which just aren't public) and because it's unclear whether, for example, we'd count the NYC Wine Shop, which never actually petitioned. It's simpler to just count the successful drives and refer in passing to there being more drives in progress or unsuccessful (unless, of course, something about those drives makes them lede-worthy). I've addressed the others. Appreciate the review! czar 11:31, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
= Final review =
| class="wikitable" style="text-align:left" |
| style="vertical-align:top;"
! width="30" | Rate ! width="300"| Attribute ! | Review Comment |
| style="vertical-align:top;"
| colspan="3" | 1. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}: {{GATable/item|1a|y|Some technical terms could be expanded and wikified more, but grammar and prose quality are high }} {{GATable/item|1b|y| }} |
| style="vertical-align:top;"
| colspan="3" | 2. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}: {{GATable/item|2a|y| }} {{GATable/item|2b|y| }} {{GATable/item|2c|y| }} {{GATable/item|2d|y| }} |
| style="vertical-align:top;"
| colspan="3" | 3. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}: {{GATable/item|3a|y|I did an exhaustive search myself and everything I could find, was already in the article. Including historic news clippings. }} {{GATable/item|3b|y| }} {{GATable/item|4|y| }} {{GATable/item|5|y| }} |
| style="vertical-align:top;"
| colspan="3" | 6. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}: {{GATable/item|6a|na| }} {{GATable/item|6b|na| }} {{GATable/item|7|y|Congratulations on yet another Good Article about WP:LABOR }} |
Congratulations User:Czar on another Good Article! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 13:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC)