Talk:Truth (anti-tobacco campaign)
{{talk page}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Health and fitness|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Marketing & Advertising|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|USGov=yes|USGov-importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Websites|importance=Low}}
}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Truth (anti-tobacco campaign)/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}
Chemophobia
Why does this article not have a section talking about how Truth's tactics are largely misleading, manipulative scare tactics centered on exploiting people's chemophobia and scientific illiteracy? Example: "urine and tobacco both contain urea" Urea is a harmless substance that is used extensively in cosmetics and even has medical applications. See Dihydrogen monoxide parody for comparison. Succubus MacAstaroth (talk) 10:49, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
:{{Ping|Succubus MacAstaroth}} Well, playing devil's advocate here for a moment, I suppose Wikipedia editors would tell you that, as far as a criticism section for the article, any claims of Truth's tactics being misleading & manipulative scare tactics & such would have to be backed up by legitimate, credible sources.
:So, I'm guessing your next step should be to start doing research; see if you can come across any legit, credible outlets that have information that's been proven. Then, you could probably start editing the article, inserting information that's backed up by research. Afterwards, would have to wait & see how Wikipedia editors respond. 2600:1700:C960:2270:844:65B9:B1FD:2CDD (talk) 06:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)