Login
Login

Talk:U2 concert in Sarajevo/GA1

GA Review

{{al|{{#titleparts:1997 U2 concert in Sarajevo/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:1997 U2 concert in Sarajevo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Annalise (talk) 22:19, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I'm going to be reviewing this article over the next few days.

:GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
  2. :a (prose): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (MoS): {{GAList/check|aye}}
  3. :: My only concern is about the set list: the manual of style says that lists should only be included if they cannot be integrated into the prose, and it seems like the set list is already well-integrated. I have more details in the section on images.
  4. :::And those are fixed!
  5. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  6. :a (references): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|aye}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|aye}}
  7. :: Looks good.
  8. It is broad in its coverage.
  9. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|aye}}
  10. ::
  11. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
  12. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|aye}}
  13. :: Everything seems fine to me, but I don't know very much about the Bosnian War, so I wouldn't be surprised if there was something related to that that I didn't catch.
  14. It is stable.
  15. :No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|aye}}
  16. ::
  17. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
  18. :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|aye}}
  19. :: Most of the images look good, and although it would be nice to have an actual image of the concert, I can understand if that isn't possible. I'm a little confused, though, about the set list image. I don't think that it's necessary to have both the set list in text and in an image. Honestly, I think the section above the lists goes over the songs that were played quite well.

:::The image was originally included since it showed that the band had considered playing an additional song, but that it did not make the setlist. I agree with your comments though, so I've integrated it into the prose instead and removed both the setlist section and the image. MelicansMatkin (talk, contributions) 02:05, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

::::Oh, okay, that makes SO much more sense. I figured it was something like that, but I'm glad you fixed it. The article looks much better now. Annalise (talk) 02:53, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

  1. Overall:
  2. :Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|aye}}
  3. :: And it looks like everything's good. Congratulations!