Talk:Uijeongbu scandal#Rationale for deletion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on Uijeongbu scandal. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=712811664 my edit]. You may add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200701/200701080014.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:18, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Incredibly short, single-paragraph stub article about an event nobody outside of South Korea remembers. Of its 15 edits prior to my nomination, 3 are from before 2015, 4 are from Piotrus, and only 2 of its 6 edits between 2016 and my nomination are not by bots. Oh, and it only has 3 sources, not counting the "Further Reading" section. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 00:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

:Give Wikipedia:Notability a read. This article is notable. Being a paragraph long is not a supporting argument for deletion. You also didn't follow deletion protocol and generate a discussion page. I'm going to undo your nom, I don't think it's likely to pass.

:I welcome you to renom with the proper protocol though. toobigtokale (talk) 18:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)