Talk:Ullmann reaction
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Chemistry|importance=mid}}
}}
OrganoCuprates?
R-X > R-Cu-X ? X=I does not exist as Cupric compound. More likely 2Cu + R-I > R-Cu + CuI as a complex.
Shjacks45 (talk) 04:09, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
https://www.organic-chemistry.org/namedreactions/ullmann-reaction.shtm good place to start — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeongbean (talk • contribs) 17:42, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 300
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/The_University_of_British_Columbia/CHEM_300_(Fall_2023) | assignments = Jeongbean, Aromatic Thiol | reviewers = Erdabravest2001, Primary resource, Paoof, Chmstr | start_date = 2023-09-06 | end_date = 2023-12-07 }}
— Assignment last updated by CHEM 300 UBC CJA (talk) 18:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Peer Review
Lead:
It doesn't seem like a new lead was added? The original lead, however, was very good, so I think this is okay.
Content:
Content added is very informative! I enjoyed reading about the history of the Ullmann reaction, as well as how it was developed. I think adding more section headings could be useful: the section added seems like a history section, but the current article does not have a history section.
Tone and Balance:
Tone is neutral and not biased towards any side!
Sources and References:
Might be good to add a few more references, especially since they're discussing a very chemical topic. I think the history section would benefit a lot from additional references, as well as the explanation of the mechanism! As well, the addition of internal links to other wikipedia pages could be useful.
Images and Media:
No images or media is added, but the original page has quite a few images so this is okay!
Overall Impressions:
Could be good to title different the sections with subtitles to emphasize separation! For example, Current State can be a subheading of History and Development. As well, adding a diagram of the mechanism could be very helpful rather than just explaining it in words. I think the history context of this reaction is very interesting, and I'm glad it was added!