Talk:Underground Astronauts

{{Old AfD multi |date=11 April 2019 |result=speedy keep |page=Underground Astronauts}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=Start|1=

}}

Anyone, nominate this article for deletion

Ãnyone should nominate this article for deletion. The phrase/name is not notable, although used by media perhaps more than once. (Later one can deal with the issue of university students who each have their article on Wikipedia.) {{ping|Bledwith}}. Signed, another 30-meter-underground-"astronaut", 89.8.158.26 (talk) 15:00, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

In 2019 there was a half-hearted attempt at having the articled merged (and thereby deleted). However there was no claim that the phrase/name is not notable. When nominating the article for deletion again, there needs to be a justification or rationale, for deletion: Example, "non-notable name/phrase".

I support having the article deleted - the name/phrase does not seem notable, even though media has used the name/phrase at least once. 89.8.158.26 (talk) 17:37, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Evolution of the Genus Homo

{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_California_Riverside/Evolution_of_the_Genus_Homo_(Spring) | assignments = Cornyon | start_date = 2022-03-29 | end_date = 2022-06-03 }}

"Controversy"

Regarding the final sentence of this section; does the fact Berger released the findings as open access really add to the controversy? Surely, this particular move has not been criticised or deemed controversial. 2A02:C7C:5690:A000:6DA0:3C03:1043:2CB (talk) 11:23, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

:If I am wrong about that then it needs to be explained in the paragraph. 2A02:C7C:5690:A000:6DA0:3C03:1043:2CB (talk) 11:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)