Talk:Virgin Killer#Worldwide press coverage
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{Censor}}
{{Warning|Important notice: Prior discussion has determined by broad consensus that the Virgin Killer cover will not be removed. If you find this image offensive, it is possible to configure your browser not to display it. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is not censored. See the image talk page for the archived discussions.}}
{{Controversial}}
{{Calm}}
{{Article history|action1=AFD
|action1date=03:41, 7 May 2005
|action1link=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virgin Killer
|action1result=keep
|action1oldid=15147643
|action2=GAN
|action2date=23:17, 9 December 2008
|action2link=Talk:Virgin Killer/GA1
|action2result=not listed
|action2oldid=256882624
|currentstatus=FGAN
|topic=Music
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1=
{{WikiProject Albums}}
{{WikiProject Metal}}
}}
{{Press
| title=Wikipedia child image censored
| date=
| url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7770456.stm
| org= BBC News
| title2=Wikipedia Blocks British Editors Amid Censorship Flap
| author2=David Kravets
| date2=December 8, 2008
| url2= http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/12/wikipedia-block.html
| org2= Wired
| title3=Wikipedia article blocked over child pornography concerns
| author3=
| date3=8 December 2008
| url3= http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/3681148/Wikipedia-article-bloacover-child-pornography-concerns.html
| org3= The Daily Telegraph
| title4=Wikipedia article blocked in UK over child photo
| author4=Raphael G. Satter
| date4=December 8, 2008
| url4= http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iLhtaFheXFcickVqO0crbKo1IiawD94U4D6O1
| org4= Associated Press
| title5=Wikipedia Censorship Sparks Free Speech Debate
| author5=JR Raphael
| date5=December 8, 2008
| url5= http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/08/AR2008120803188.html
| org5= PC World
| title6=Wikipedia Censored In U.K. Over Nude Girl
| author6=K.C. Jones
| date6=December 8, 2008
| url6= http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/policy/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=212300138
| org6= InformationWeek
| title7= British agency resolves dispute with Wikipedia
| author7= Noam Cohen
| date7= December 10, 2008
| url7= http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/12/10/technology/wiki.php
| org7= International Herald Tribune
|author8= Bobbie Johnson, technology correspondent
|date8=8 December 2008
|url8= http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/dec/08/wikipedia-censorship
|title8= Wikipedia falls foul of British censors:Wikipedia page blacklisted over 'potentially illegal' album cover from 1976
|org8= The Guardian
|section8= News:Technology:Wikipedia
|collapsed=yes
}}
{{Caution|image=Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg|Between 4 and 9 December 2008 the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation placed this article on its blacklist. As a result participating ISPs blocked access to this article for a large proportion of British users. For an explanation and official response by the charity that runs Wikipedia, please see the press release by the Wikimedia Foundation, as well as its Q&A. For more information, see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/2008_IWF_action.}}
{{annual readership}}
Album Cover Art
Caption claims girl is "posing suggestively". I fail to see how. What, precisely is her pose "suggesting"??? It clearly is a pose for the camera. I'd characterize it as "assertive". Anyway, my point is that "suggestively" is only in the mind of certain viewers and is far from an objective description.98.19.179.27 (talk) 03:23, 2 April 2025 (UTC)