Talk:Warcraft II: Tides of Darkness#Merger proposal

{{Article history|action1=GAN

|action1date=00:43, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

|action1link=Talk:Warcraft II: Tides of Darkness/GA1

|action1result=failed

|action1oldid=372178545

|action2=PR

|action2date=06:10, 21 July 2010

|action2link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Warcraft II/archive1

|action2result=reviewed

|action2oldid=374512034

|action3=GAR

|action3date=21:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

|action3link=Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Warcraft II/1

|action3result=not listed

|action3oldid=381308668

|action4=GAR

|action4date=23:50, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

|action4link=Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Warcraft II/2

|action4result=not listed

|action4oldid=463397212

|action5=GAN

|action5date=03:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

|action5link=Talk:Warcraft II: Tides of Darkness/GA2

|action5result=failed

|action5oldid=472800006

|topic = Video games

|currentstatus=FGAN

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}

|maxarchivesize = 256K

|counter = 1

|minthreadsleft = 0

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|algo = old(30d)

|archive = Talk:Warcraft II: Tides of Darkness/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{refideas

|http://www.pcgamer.com/the-complete-history-of-blizzard-games-on-pc/

|https://archive.org/stream/UneditedPCGamer_marktrade/PC_Gamer_014u#page/n29/mode/2up

|https://web.archive.org/web/20180503215343/https://www.ocregister.com/2008/03/10/timeline-of-blizzard-entertainment/

|https://web.archive.org/web/19970606064353/http://www.next-generation.com:80/news/020896e.html

|https://web.archive.org/web/19970605143946/http://www.next-generation.com:80/news.chtml

|https://web.archive.org/web/19970606063048/http://www.next-generation.com:80/news/032096d.html

|https://web.archive.org/web/19970606025946/http://www.next-generation.com:80/specials/030597.chtml

|https://web.archive.org/web/20160322202903/http://scans.roushimsx.com/PCGamer_1996_06_pg047.jpg

|https://web.archive.org/web/19980213105939/http://gamespot.com:80/features/wc2/index.html

|http://web.archive.org/web/19990507211447/http://headline.gamespot.com:80/news/97_08/20_warcraft/index.html

|https://web.archive.org/web/19961220225834/http://www.nuke.com:80/cgr/news/9606/davidson.htm

|https://archive.org/stream/UneditedPCGamer_marktrade/PC_Gamer_015u#page/n69/mode/2up

|https://web.archive.org/web/19970419215705/http://www.next-generation.com:80/news/020296e.html

|http://twvideo01.ubm-us.net/o1/vault/GD_Mag_Archives/GDM_AprMay_1996.pdf

}}

Alpha?

Should the Alpha version be mentioned? I do understand that it is not "general knowledge", but then again, neither is the entire Warcraft Universe. The Alpha version of Warcraft 2 was in quite heavy rotation back in the day and it is -- all things considered -- a nice piece of Warcraftiana. Further, if there's a place where I'd go looking for info on the nowadays-hard-to-come-by Warcraft 2 Alpha thingie, this is the page where I'd go foraging. I realize that a separate page would be pushing it, but a mention (however quick) is quite defendable and understandable. ~Anonymous Wanderer

Source

https://web.archive.org/web/20000305204510/http://headline.gamespot.com/news/97_08/20_warcraft/index.html