Talk:Wespe-class gunboat/GA1
GA review
{{atopg
| status =
| result = Passed. Hog Farm talk 22:44, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
}}
{{Good article tools}}
Nominator: {{User|Parsecboy}} 23:29, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 18:06, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
I'm surprised this has gone so long without a review, I'll get to this sometime this coming week. Hog Farm talk 18:06, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- "a depth of hold of 4.10 m (13 ft 5 in), " - is there a particular reason that this is rounded to two digits instead of just one?
- Nope, fixed
- "The ships featured a light iron superstructure that served to make the boats more seaworthy" - did this actually improve seaworthiness, or was it just designed to do that? Because it sounds like these ships were barely able to stay afloat.
- I think we're talking about a very low bar here - they were at least more seaworthy than a rock ;)
- " from 700 PS (690 ihp), " - I think there needs to be a link or gloss for PS here; additionally, the infobox lists 800 PS as the installed power
- Fixed - 700 was a typo
- The complement in the infobox needs to be either sourced there or mentioned & sourced in the body
- It's in the 2nd paragraph of the General characteristics section
- "The deck of the Wespes was protected by a layer of 22 mm (1 in) thick wrought iron atop another layer of 28 mm (1.1 in) iron armor. - this would be 50 mm of deck armor, but the infobox gives a figure of 44 mm
- Ah, I didn't catch that when I rewrote the article - should be 2 layers of 22mm iron on a 28mm teak deck.
- "Viper remained in service the longest, outlasting even Hummel by at least a decade and a half; she remained in active use as a crane vessel at least as late as 1970" - is 1970 a typo for 1960, or should it be two decades and a half, since Hummel was sank in 1945?
- I mean, "at least a decade and a half" is unbounded, so 25 years is technically correct (or maybe I just can't do math!)
Once these are addressed, I'll do the spot-check. Hog Farm talk 02:03, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
:Thanks HF! Parsecboy (talk) 10:11, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
:: Life has gotten busy for a short stretch - I haven't forgotten about this. Hoping to be able to take a final look Thursday maybe. Hog Farm talk 03:28, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
:::Not a problem at all - I'm traveling right now (it's my kids' spring break week) so I have plenty of things to keep me busy! Parsecboy (talk) 10:15, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Okay - finally have time to finish this.
Spot-checks:
- "David Lyon takes a more positive view, stating that "no doubt they would have been useful vessels in any war off Germany's coast, in their earlier years." - OK
- "the Wespe-class ships could be run aground on sandbars along the coast, as semi-fixed coastal artillery batteries" - OK
- 1878 launching date for Basilisk - OK
This looks OK, will AGF the sources in German. Promoting. Hog Farm talk 22:43, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
{{abot}}