Login
Login

Talk:Wieferich prime/GA1#GA Review

GA Review

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Wieferich prime/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Wieferich prime/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 10:46, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

:GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
  2. :a (prose): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check|aye}}
  3. :: What does "≡" means? If and only if? And "∤" means "restriction to"?
  4. ::::"≡" in the context of this article denotes a congruence on the integers. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 18:47, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
  5. ::::"∤" here means "does not divide" (it is listed at List of mathematical symbols#Symbols). -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 18:47, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
  6. ::::I wikilinked the symbol "∤" to an article where it is explained. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 18:32, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
  7. :: "log log x" a word too much or intentional?
  8. ::::This is intentional. It denotes the logarithm of the logarithm of x. I added parentheses for clarity [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wieferich_prime&diff=491435986&oldid=491364560 here]. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 18:47, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
  9. :: Similar uncommon units should be linked
  10. ::::What in particular do you think should be linked? -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 18:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
  11. :::::Can you explain what does the small omega in the second table refers to? If you do this I am happy to pass this article.
  12. ::::::Explained in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wieferich_prime&diff=492067905&oldid=491779912 this edit]. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 20:21, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
  13. :: Red links should be created or explained in the article (for example, I don't know what a "Catalan pseudoprime" is)
  14. ::::Redlinks First case of Fermat's last theorem and Catalan pseudoprime eliminated by creating those articles. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 20:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
  15. :: Non-english sources should be labelled as such.
  16. ::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wieferich_prime&curid=323631&diff=491657058&oldid=491646577 Done]. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 19:25, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
  17. :: Suggest to remove the red links in the reference section, as it is unlikely they will be created.
  18. ::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wieferich_prime&diff=prev&oldid=491660981 Done]. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 19:46, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
  19. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  20. :a (references): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|aye}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|aye}}
  21. :: Overall ok
  22. It is broad in its coverage.
  23. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|aye}}
  24. ::
  25. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
  26. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|aye}}
  27. ::
  28. It is stable.
  29. :No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|aye}}
  30. ::
  31. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
  32. :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|aye}}
  33. ::
  34. Overall: On hold to give you time fixing the problems.--GoPTCN 11:43, 8 May 2012 (UTC) Pass
  35. :Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|aye}}
  36. ::

(Note): My common practice is to paste the template into the GAN. I often check points 5 and 6 (stability and pictures) before reviewing because they are easy to check. "Neutral" is confusing, as it may also mean that I did not review this points. Ok, now I will resume my review :)--GoPTCN 11:14, 8 May 2012 (UTC)