Talk:Wool 100%

Very strange. I was an uninvolved editor looking into a dispute between two parties (one of whom has now been blocked). I added two sources out of several found to verify that this film can be listed as surrealism. This is also ongoing at I Will Walk Like a Crazy Horse. The main editor will not accept the sources. I have not said the statement need be in the lead but it is properly sourced and should be in the article. Original addition was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wool_100%25&diff=578347260&oldid=578345717 here] and the editor "TheOldJacobite" has been reverted by others for the same thing at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=I_Will_Walk_Like_a_Crazy_Horse&diff=578378002&oldid=578377188 the "I Will Walk Like a Crazy Horse" article]. I don't feel like adding to a revert war so I will take this to dispute resolution if it is reverted again. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:02, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

:The sources are not adequate to support the claim. A Surrealist film means a film made by a person connected to the Surrealist movement. The vague adjective "surreal" is meaningless. ---The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 01:44, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

::Interesting. Wikipedia's own article Surrealist cinema says nothing about that. It says "Surrealist cinema is characterised by juxtapositions, the rejection of dramatic psychology, and a frequent use of shocking imagery." Nothing about it "must" be done by a particular person. Nor do I see surrealism described this way at [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/surrealism dictionary.com] or [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/surrealism Websters]. Everything I read tells me your definition is a faulty and extremely narrow vision of things. You have been reverted by multiple editors on this issue. Fyunck(click) (talk) 03:27, 4 December 2013 (UTC)