Talk:Xchanging

{{Old AfD multi|page=Xchanging|date=19 August 2010|result=nomination withdrawn}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|

{{WikiProject Companies|importance=low}}

{{WikiProject London|importance=low}}

}}

Comments

This is definitely biased in favor of the company. So far as I can tell the text was not stolen directly from the [http://www.xchanging.com/resourcing/index.htm company's website]. Sophy's Duckling 01:48, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

I have noticed that the XCHANGING main page has been locked due to [recent repetitive additions]. Why was this comment regarded as vandalism? How can a fact be vandalism?

Are Wikipedia only interested in positive issues regarding a company? Why shouldn't negative comments about a company be

allowed if they are true? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.109.242.63 (talk) 15:04, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

  • (Removed. Uncle G (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2010 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.109.242.63 (talk) 15:12, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Say what? I had originally proposed to delete this page as uninformative advertising. These claims you are making need first to be referenced to reliable sources that other people can check out. Do that, and your case for including them will be much stronger. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 03:18, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
  • agreed...whoever keeps putting up this unsubstantiated claim needs to back it up with some facts rather than just writing an unreliable statement. Something like this could be considered slander against the person could it not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.7.83.99 (talk) 11:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
  • have has to delete the revision about Folkestone. it is made up again. this guy continues to do this, and we will continue to remove it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rowing101 (talkcontribs) 15:21, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

:::Pending review lacks citations and links to claims; content is not verifable Rowing101 (talk) 15:00, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Xchanging BM rgb.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

100px

|

An image used in this article, File:Xchanging BM rgb.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

;What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)