Television New Zealand Ltd v Quinn
{{Short description|New Zealand defamation case}}
{{unreferenced|date=March 2014}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2014}}
{{Use New Zealand English|date=March 2014}}
{{Infobox court case
| name = Television New Zealand Ltd v Quinn
| court = Court of Appeal of New Zealand
| date_filed =
| image = Coat of arms of New Zealand.svg
| date decided = 19 April 1996
| full name = Television New Zealand Limited v TA Quinn
| citations = [1996] 3 NZLR 24
| judges = Cooke P, Richardson J, Gault J, McKay J, Mcgechan J
| prior actions =
| subsequent actions =
| opinions =
| transcripts = [http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/1995/295.pdf High Court judgment]
| Keywords = defamation
}}
Television New Zealand Ltd v Quinn [1996] 3 NZLR 24 is a New Zealand defamation case.
Background
TVNZ current affairs show Holmes, in 2 different episodes alleging that the president of the Auckland Trotting Club, Mr Quinn was involved in illegal horse doping and financial misconduct involving the club.
Both allegations were later to be discovered to be untrue. It was also later held that the programs investigation at the time did not meet the expected journalist standards.
Quinn sued TVNZ for defamation for both matters, and was awarded $400,000 for the horse doping allegation, and $1.1 million for the financial misconduct allegation.
TVNZ appealed both awards.
Held
The Court of Appeal ruled that the award for the $400,000 while it was at the upper amount for defamation, it was not going to be reversed. However, with regards to the award for $1.1 million, the court found this to be excessive, and referred it back to the High Court, with the recommendation that any award over $500,000 might be found excessive.
References
{{Reflist}}
Category:Court of Appeal of New Zealand cases
Category:1996 in New Zealand law
Category:New Zealand tort case law
{{NewZealand-case-law-stub}}