Template:Did you know nominations/2018–19 College Football Playoff

{{DYKsubpage

|monthyear=May 2025

|passed=

|2=

{{DYK nompage links|nompage=2018–19 College Football Playoff|2018–19 College Football Playoff}}

... that the championship game of the 2018–19 College Football Playoff had the worst viewership of any college football championship since 2012? Source: [https://sports.yahoo.com/2019-national-championship-game-lowest-165507815.html]
ALT0b: ... that fewer people watched the championship game of the 2018–19 College Football Playoff than any college football championship since 2012? Source: [https://sports.yahoo.com/2019-national-championship-game-lowest-165507815.html]
ALT1: ... that the 2018–19 College Football Playoff included a game between Alabama and Clemson, making it the fourth consecutive playoff to include such a game? Source: [https://www.wvtm13.com/article/alabama-vs-clemson-2019-cfb-playoff-national-championship-game-info/25782320]
ALT2: ... that Alabama and Clemson had played against each other in each of the previous three editions of the College Football Playoff before their meeting in the 2018–19 edition? Source: [https://www.wvtm13.com/article/alabama-vs-clemson-2019-cfb-playoff-national-championship-game-info/25782320]
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Buried Alive!, Template:Did you know nominations/2018 European Athletics Championships – Women's 400 metres

{{smalldiv|1=Improved to Good Article status by {{user0|PCN02WPS}}.

Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 88 past nominations.}}

PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 16:02, 28 May 2025 (UTC).

16px 2 QPQs done for backlog mode. GA status confirmed, hook is meh for me but presumably of some interest to someone who cares about this topic. Copyvio spotcheck, neutrality, etc. all GTG. Still, I'd ask for a more interesting hook. Even if I frame it in terms of stuff I care about, I can't start to care that some minor event had poor viewership in a few years frame. Can't we say anything more interesting? I don't want to hold this over my subjective view of what's interesting, but if possible, please suggest more hooks. (Hint: ChatGPT is decent at coming up with ideas - and I doubt it can do worse than what we have here, TBH). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:03, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
{{ping|Piotrus}} {{tq|I doubt it can do worse than what we have here}} - ouch. See above. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 15:19, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
16px Approving now. I honestly don't consider the new hooks much better, but I don't want to veto this based on my subjective feeling; it may be that I just don't find the topic that thrilling and I can't appreciate trivia that someone else will find interesting. The closing admins can choose the hook they like the best, if any. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:53, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

}}