Login
Login

Template:Did you know nominations/Armand Ceritano

{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Template|Category:Passed DYK nominations from January 2025|}}

:The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hilst talk 12:43, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

{{DYK tools|nominator=BeanieFan11}}

{{DYK header|Armand Ceritano}}

{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Armand Ceritano|Armand Ceritano}}

{{smalldiv|1=

  • Source: [https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-philadelphia-inquirer-ceritano-his/15424866/ Philadelphia Inquirer] ("Westinghouse was almost ready to begin foreclosure when Ceritano appeared on the scene. Because of the plight of the hotel, the company turned over the $6.8 million mortgage to him in return for a smile and a handshake. The only money involved was the $20 filing fee for the papers, which, incidentally, Ceritano says he borrowed from two layers.")}}
  • ALT1: ... that Armand Ceritano acquired a Philadelphia hotel for "a smile and a handshake" – and $20, borrowed from others? Source: same, but with the addition of the $20 filing fee
  • ALT2: ... that future millionaire Armand Ceritano said that when he arrived to the U.S. as an immigrant, "My only capital ... was a goat"? Source: [https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-philadelphia-inquirer/161458019/ quote from this article]; also e.g. [https://www.newspapers.com/article/courier-post/161457748/ this] if you need an article directly calling him a millionaire
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/KMUN

{{smalldiv|1=Moved to mainspace by {{user0|BeanieFan11}}.

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 288 past nominations.}}

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC).

  • 16px New enough and long enough. Article is well-written and researched. No signs of copyright issues. QPQ checks. Hook is cited and is interesting; I can't read the part that backs up the statement in the preview so it is accepted in good faith. I prefer ALT1, but all three hooks look good to me. Damien Linnane (talk) 00:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
|}}