Template:Did you know nominations/Bekah Brunstetter
:The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page. The result was: promoted by feminist (talk) 14:40, 18 March 2019 (UTC) {{DYK conditions}} {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Bekah Brunstetter|Bekah Brunstetter}} :* Reviewed: QPQ exempt, 4th nomination Moved to mainspace by Trillfendi (talk) and Bakazaka (talk). Nominated by Bakazaka (talk) at 01:07, 7 March 2019 (UTC). :* The article is new and long enough. It has inline citations throughout and is written neutrally. The article only has one image and it is properly licensed. No QPQ needed. Copyvio tool didn't find any violations. One issue though: I'm not a fan of all the direct quotes (it may fall into overuse territory) and I think some of the reviews of her works can be paraphrased. Review of the hooks: ::*ALT0: The part about the play being "about a baker refusing to serve gay customers" isn't exactly mentioned in the article as per DYK rule 3a. The article instead says that it's "about a baker whose beliefs are challenged when she is asked to bake a cake for a lesbian wedding", which doesn't necessarily mean that the baker refused to serve gay people. Perhaps the play's description in the article can be tweaked to reflect the hook more clearly, just to be on the safe side of DYK. Also, I think the hook should state that her father's opposition to SSM partly inspired the play, so as to better reflect the source and article. ::*ALT1: I'm not a fan of this one, mostly because I don't like the use of "award-winning" on Wikipedia, but otherwise it is sourced and stated in the article. ::*ALT2: No issues. :16px On hold for now. {{ping|Bakazaka}} do ping me to let me know when the above points have been addressed or if you have any questions about my review. Thanks. Bennv3771 (talk) 06:12, 9 March 2019 (UTC) ::{{replyto|Bennv3771}} Thanks for taking on this review. I've just done an editing pass through the article that a) brings the description of the play's contents in line with ALT0, and b) greatly reduces the use of direct quotes. I am of course fine with changing "inspired" to "partly inspired" in ALT0, though I cannot remember if I am permitted to change the proposed text myself once the review starts. Bakazaka (talk) 06:46, 9 March 2019 (UTC) :::{{re|Bakazaka}} Thanks for the addressing the points raised in my review so quickly. AFAIK, it's fine for the nominator to tweak a hook during the review process as long as the review isn't finished; I've done it before and have seen it in other DYK reviews. Bennv3771 (talk) 06:54, 9 March 2019 (UTC) ::::{{replyto|Bennv3771}} Good to know! I've made the suggested change to ALT0. Thanks again for your work on this. Bakazaka (talk) 06:58, 9 March 2019 (UTC) :::::16px Good to go. My preference is for ALT0 or ALT2. Bennv3771 (talk) 07:17, 9 March 2019 (UTC)==Bekah Brunstetter==