Template:Did you know nominations/Child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge

{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge|Child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge}}

• ... that "the world's most famous baby" (mother pictured) is expected to be born in July 2013 and generate £260 million worldwide?

:* Reviewed: Banana peel

Created by Bo.Clive (talk), Surtsicna (talk). Nominated by Surtsicna (talk) at 21:41, 28 June 2013 (UTC).

:*ALT1: ... that the Duchess of Cambridge (pictured) is expected to deliver the "the world's most famous baby" in the same hospital where Diana, Princess of Wales, had her sons?

I am not sure which hook is better ("hookier"). The first one does not reveal a lot and thus entices the reader to click on the link, but the second one contains two big names and a photograph. Perhaps we could use the first one if the article is promoted without the image and the second one if the image is deemed good enough? Surtsicna (talk) 11:13, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

• 16px My pick goes to the original hook. All criteria met; long enough, new enough, no copyvio and QPQ done. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 04:47, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
• Thanks for the quick review! The hook should probably be featured as soon as possible - the baby may come any day now. Surtsicna (talk) 10:16, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
• Comment. I have suggested on article's talk page that the article is moved to Unborn child of..., as I don't think it's right to call it child of yet. Regards, Iselilja (talk) 11:37, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
• I've responded to the talk page, but to sum it up here: [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/child Merriam-Webster] and other dictionaries confirm that the word "child" can refer to "an unborn or recently born person" as well. Referring to the child as a "child" is accurate. Surtsicna (talk) 11:40, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

{{-}}{{#if:yes|