Template:Did you know nominations/French frigate Cléopâtre (1838)
:The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page. The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 14:31, 17 January 2018 (UTC) {{DYK conditions}} {{DYK nompage links|nompage=French frigate Cléopâtre (1838)|French frigate Cléopâtre (1838)}} :* Reviewed: To follow Created by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 17:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC). :* ::*Hi LlywelynII, thanks for your review. I have now carried out a QPQ review at :Template:Did you know nominations/Boletus aurantiosplendens - Dumelow (talk) 17:08, 14 January 2018 (UTC) :::* 16px That's that, then. G2G. — LlywelynII 02:51, 15 January 2018 (UTC)==French frigate Cléopâtre (1838)==
On it. — LlywelynII 04:07, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
16px Still no QPQ? That needs to be fixed. As far as the rest, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=French_frigate_Cl%C3%A9op%C3%A2tre_(1838)&action=history new enough]; long enough (~3.5k elig. chars.); refs would benefit from a #Citation, #Bibliography format to reduce all the redundant info about Shipwrecks... but that's not a DYK concern; [http://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=French+frigate+Cl%C3%A9op%C3%A2tre+%281838%29&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 Earwig checks out]; there is some close phrasing ("...proved to be..." &c.) from Shipwrecks... but it's well out of copyright; I'd move the first part of the hook to the end as a phrasing issue, but that's not a reason to hold up the nomination. — LlywelynII 08:59, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
