Template:Did you know nominations/Harvard Environmental Law Review
:The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page. The result was: promoted by Vanamonde (talk) 10:06, 7 December 2016 (UTC) {{DYK conditions}} {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Harvard Environmental Law Review|Harvard Environmental Law Review}} :* Reviewed: Ali al-Muqri Converted from a redirect by Notecardforfree (talk). Self-nominated at 11:52, 7 November 2016 (UTC). :* 16px Size, newness through expansion, and hook check out. QPQ looks good. Sadads (talk) 02:09, 28 November 2016 (UTC) :*ALT1 ... that the focus of Harvard Environmental Law Review was changed because the original format was "too ambitious"? :::{{ping|Sadads}} I have rewritten the hook to ALT1, because it is not clear who made the comment, it was probably the editors rather than an observer. Please could you approve ALT1 and confirm that you checked the article for neutrality and policy issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC) ::::For the record, I think ALT1 is mich better than the original. Many thanks, {{u|Cwmhiraeth}}. Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 07:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC) :::::16px They both work, similar idea, and both fit well as hooks, Sadads (talk) 13:51, 1 December 2016 (UTC)==Harvard Environmental Law Review==