Template:Did you know nominations/Law of reentry

{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Template|Category:Passed DYK nominations from September 2024|}}

:The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 01:52, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

... that a law in Elizabethan Renaissance theatre was cited as proof against the theory that Macbeth is the Third Murderer?

{{smalldiv|1=

Source: "Mr. Irwin Smith [...] has demonstrated conclusively that all the apparent exceptions to the "Law of Reentry" be explained and justified in one way or another. His thesis, which I take to be unexceptionable, provides the clinching proof that Macbeth is not the Third Murderer" — [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2868513 The Third Murderer in Macbeth]}}
ALT1: ... that the law of reentry is cited as an explanation for a character's abrupt exit off the stage in Richard II{{-?}} Source: "Almost the only “rule” in London theater that was still faithfully followed was the one we now call, for convenience, the law of reentry [...]. Thus, in Richard II, John of Gaunt makes an abrupt and awkward departure purely to be able to take part in a vital scene that follows." — Shakespeare: The World as Stage; also discussed in [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2868057 Their Exits and Reentrances], p. 9 and [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2870751 Shakespeare's Hand in "The Second Maiden's Tragedy"] p. 5
ALT2: ... that because of the law of reentry, characters in Elizabethan theatre could not leave the stage at the end of a scene and immediately reenter in the next? Source: "Finally, a word may be said about Prolss' "Law of Re-entry" as it bears upon the matter of act-intermissions. Briefly the law is this: Characters leaving the stage at the end of a scene to reappear at another locality are, to avoid confusion, not permitted to re-enter immediately" — [https://www.jstor.org/stable/4171674 The "Act Time" in Elizabethan Theatres]
ALT3: ... that some scholars believe many scenes in English Renaissance plays include "speeches or even scenes otherwise unnecessary" to avoid violating the law of reentry? Source: "Neuendorff considers Prölsz's Law of Re-entry (that no character shall leave the stage and immediately re-enter if the scene is meanwhile supposed to have changed) at some length, and finds it of the greatest influence upon dramatic construction. It accounts for the many scenes beginning or ending with a monologue, and for the insertion of speeches or even scenes otherwise unnecessary." — [https://www.jstor.org/stable/432699 What We Know of the Elizabethan Stage]
Reviewed:
Comment: Since this article deals with something governing the way characters exit and enter the stage in English Renaissance plays, I'm not actually sure if any of these run afoul of the "must focus on a real-world fact" thing, so I've provided a lot of hooks.

{{smalldiv|1=5x expanded by {{user0|TenTonParasol}}.

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.}}

~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 03:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC).

16px New and long enough (from 500 B to 7000 B on Sept 17), well-sourced to academic sources. Hooks verified in sources. I would definitely go with ALT1, which is interesting because it has a mystery aspect to it and will leave people wondering what the law is. I'd suggest putting the word "law" in quotation marks. — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 20:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

|}}