Template:Did you know nominations/Nicholas Brend
{{#if:yes| :{{DYKF|11}} The following is an archived discussion of Nicholas Brend's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the {{DYK blue}} (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.{{clear}} The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 12:00, 28 April 2013 (UTC). }} {{DYKC}} {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Nicholas Brend|Nicholas Brend}} :* Reviewed: Coorabulka Created by NinaGreen (talk). Self nominated at 00:27, 21 April 2013 (UTC). :* 16px The article was long enough and just barely new enough (created 16 April, nominated 21 April), when nominated. It is cited prolifically, although with mostly offline sources. The hook is short enough and cited in the article, although in an offline source. I wikified Matthew Brend in the hook. The article for Matthew Brend had its DYK promoted but it's currently in Prep area 2 — if it's moved back, they could run together. QPQ is complete. This DYK nomination is good to go. - tucoxn\talk 04:46, 27 April 2013 (UTC){{#if:yes|==Nicholas Brend==
