Template:Did you know nominations/Periodization of Ancient Egypt

{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Template|Category:Passed DYK nominations from January 2020|}}

:The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:38, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Periodization of Ancient Egypt|Periodization of Ancient Egypt}}

... that the period names for Ancient Egyptian history, such as "Old Kingdom" and "New Kingdom", are modern inventions? Source: {{cite book|last=Schneider|first=Thomas|author-link=Thomas Schneider (Egyptologist)|editor=Klaus-Peter Adam|title=Historiographie in der Antike|pp=181–197|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BTMAu2LRbVUC&pg=PA182|date=27 August 2008|publisher=Walter de Gruyter|isbn=978-3-11-020672-2|chapter=Periodizing Egyptian History: Manetho, Convention, and Beyond|quote=Paragraph starting: "It is crucial here to clarify that the structure given to the Egyptian past by modern Egyptology is only partly Manethonian..."}}

:* Reviewed: Enrique Ika

Created by Onceinawhile (talk). Self-nominated at 23:07, 1 January 2020 (UTC).

:* 16px Article is new enough, long enough (~2000+ characters, excluding lists / bulleted lines, and block quote), well written and clear, well cited and sources do match the content, no copyvio, hook has inline citation and is supported by the source, QPQ is done. Good to go. Bammesk (talk) 02:39, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

|}}