Template:Did you know nominations/Powderly Creek

Category:Passed DYK nominations from June 2015

:The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 10:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

==Powderly Creek==

... that in the early 1970s, a flooded strip pit near Powderly Creek made national news when a UFO supposedly crashed into it?

:* ALT1:... that Powderly Creek cuts a "macabre" channel through Bushwick silt basin?

:* Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/1630 Crete earthquake

Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self-nominated at 17:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC).

:* 16px The QPQ review at Template:Did you know nominations/1630 Crete earthquake is being used for this nomination and for the Template:Did you know nominations/Eddy Creek (Lackawanna River) (which was approved by another user) and Template:Did you know nominations/Lees Creek (Lackawanna River) nominations. Per WP:WIADYK, #5, "For every nomination you make you must review one other nomination." The 1630 Crete earthquake review cannot be used for multiple nominations. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:48, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

:::16px Whoa, hold it. The 1630 Crete Earthquake is a triple nomination! The nominator added two more bolded links and I reviewed them. Even if that weren't the case, you could just, you know, have me do another QPQ instead of rejecting it. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 09:59, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

::::Sorry for the potential confusion. However, at the 1630 Crete Earthquake nomination, you did not really provide a review for Kythira Strait. Rather, you proposed a standalone hook. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:22, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

:::::16px The QPQ review is now finished. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 16:57, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

::::::16px New enough, long enough, hook is sourced to reliable source. I detected no neutrality issue and no close paraphrasing with the checks I made.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 04:30, 27 July 2015 (UTC)