Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Scull

Category:Passed DYK nominations from October 2016

:The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:53, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

==Robert Scull==

... that Robert Scull auction in 1973 of 50 Pop art works from his collection was viewed by the art establishment as the nouveaux riches cashing in? Source: "That auction, “The Collection of Robert C. Scull,” was the first of contemporary American art by a single seller. Its 50 lots of mostly Pop Art brought in $2.2 million (about $10.8 million in 2010 dollars), just above the high estimate, along with stunning evidence that the value of 1960s art would rise exponentially. It was immediately seen as a fall from grace for the Sculls — nouveaux riches cashing in — and the New York art world too." (and [https://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/16/arts/design/16scull.html])

:* Reviewed: John Hervey, 7th Marquess of Bristol

Created by Edwardx (talk) and Modernist (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 22:56, 25 October 2016 (UTC).

16px Some issues found.

✓ This article is new and was created on 18:50, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 2177 characters

✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation

✗ This article has the following issues:

{{tlx|US-business-bio-1910s-stub}} from creation

✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (14.5% confidence; [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Robert+Scull&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=1 confirm])

Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.

16px Some overall issues detected

✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 139 characters

✓ The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 1 characters

✗ Edwardx has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review is required for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot.

--DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 20:47, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

:* {{DYK checklist

|newness = y

|length = y

|eligibilityother =

|sourced = y

|neutral = y

|plagiarismfree = y

|policyother =

|hookcited = y

|hookinterest = y

|hookother =

|picfree = NA

|picused =

|picclear =

|qpq = not done

|status = ?

|comments =

|sign = — Yellow Dingo (talk) 04:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

}}

:* Thank you, Yellow Dingo. QPQ now done. Edwardx (talk) 01:36, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

:*:16px Good to go now. — Yellow Dingo (talk) 01:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC)