Template:Did you know nominations/Train graveyard

Category:Passed DYK nominations from April 2018

:The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:27, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

==Train graveyard==

{{main page image|image=File:Uyuni Train (crop).jpg|caption=A train at the Uyuni train graveyard|width=120x133}}

{{main page image|image=File:Budapest, Istvántelki Főműhely, vonattemető, 4.jpg|caption=Abandoned trains in Hungary|width=120x133}}

... that some train graveyards are tourist attractions? Source: [https://www.lonelyplanet.com/bolivia/uyuni/attractions/cementerio-de-trenes/a/poi-sig/467252/363148 "The only real attraction in Uyuni itself, the Cementerio de Trenes is a rusty collection of historic steam locomotives"], [https://www.expedia.co.uk/Train-Cemetery-Uyuni.d6224162.Attraction and]

:* Reviewed: Konstantin Sellheim

Created by Violetriga (talk). Self-nominated at 22:42, 1 April 2018 (UTC).

:*16px A very interesting hook, but I would suggest you add an image to your hook, to add to the "hookiness". Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:23, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

:::Thanks for the review. Unfortunately I don't think that any of the available images look any good at the required size. violet/riga _^[talk] 18:39, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

:::Unless :File:Uyuni Décembre 2007 - Cimetière de Trains 1.jpg could be cropped? violet/riga _^[talk] 19:24, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

::::I've done that now. violet/riga _^[talk] 22:14, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

:::::{{ping|Violetriga}} Does :File:Budapest, Istvántelki Főműhely, vonattemető, 4.jpg not work? It was my preference to be honest. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:06, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

::::::I see what you're saying and have added it above. My concern is that it's a little difficult to see what it is, but then that might be a good thing. violet/riga _^[talk] 12:57, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

16px Article was created on the day it was nominated, and it meets the length requirements. Earwigs detected no copyright problems. All images in the article are appropriately licensed. QPQ provided. However, the lead is completely unsourced. While references in the lead is usually optional, it's not in this particular case, particularly on the information regarding Woodham Brothers or the information about train graveyards being different from abandoned railways. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
The Woodham Brothers content was added recently by someone else and I've now worked it into the article. Given that abandoned railway clearly defines that as "a railway line which is no longer used for that purpose" as opposed to "where trains and rolling stock are discarded" I don't see why a reference would be needed - I think it's quite self-explanatory? violet/riga _^[talk] 12:37, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
16px No problems left so this should be good to go; hook is cited inline. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:56, 23 April 2018 (UTC)