Template:Did you know nominations/Valley Medical Center (Washington)

{{DYKsubpage

|monthyear=May 2025

|passed=

|2=

{{DYK tools|nominator=SounderBruce}}

{{DYK header|Valley Medical Center (Washington)}}

{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Valley Medical Center (Washington)|Valley Medical Center (Washington)}}

{{smalldiv|1=Created by {{user0|SounderBruce}}.

Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 257 past nominations.}}

SounderBruce 04:09, 17 May 2025 (UTC).

{{DYK checklist

|newness = y

|length = y

|eligibilityother =

|sourced = y

|neutral = y

|plagiarismfree = y

|policyother =

|hookcited = ?

|hookinterest = y

|hookother =

|qpq = ?

|status = ?

|comments = Hello {{u|SounderBruce}}, happy to review this nomination. The article was created on May 16, 2025. It has a readable prose size of 5936 characters. Every paragraph in the article is sourced. The article does not use promotional or overly negative language. WP:EARWIG shows no copyvios. The first hook is supported by the source but I can't find the claim about "600 percent" in the linked source of the second hook. Both hooks are interesting. One QPQ was done but I think two are currently required because of the backlog mode.

|sign = Phlsph7 (talk) 10:28, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

}}

  • {{ping|SounderBruce}} Please address the above. Z1720 (talk) 15:28, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
  • {{ping|Phlsph7}} Second QPQ added (though I really wish the DYK tool had a proper warning for this). As for the hook's sourcing, the 600 percent figure is quoted from the offline April 11, 2005 article of the Post-Intelligencer. SounderBruce 03:47, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
  • : 16px Looks good, that takes care of the remaining concerns. Phlsph7 (talk) 08:14, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

}}